Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Child Support : (Formerly part of Child Custody and Visitation.)
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Child Support

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:44 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4

Back Childsupport


In California...

Two people get divorced with a baby. Mom takes baby 2/3 of time, Dad 1/3. They agree on equal custody. They verbally agree to try to split all the child's bills 50/50(nothing written). They make very similar amounts. Dad might make a little more. Everything is fine for a year and a half. Mom starts having money trouble. Wants child support now. If Dad says I want 50/50 custody does he have to pay still? Can she seek back child support if there was never any written agreement on it?What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
  #2  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by HJ-CA View Post
In California...

Two people get divorced with a baby. Mom takes baby 2/3 of time, Dad 1/3. They agree on equal custody. They verbally agree to try to split all the child's bills 50/50(nothing written). They make very similar amounts. Dad might make a little more. Everything is fine for a year and a half. Mom starts having money trouble. Wants child support now. If Dad says I want 50/50 custody does he have to pay still? Can she seek back child support if there was never any written agreement on it?What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
if no support was ordered at the time of divorce, then support would only start on the filing date for modification.

dad wanting 50/50 does not always get rid of the support issue. dad filing for 50/50 AFTER mom files for support, WILL be noticed by the judge. and doesn't make the judge smile.
  #3  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by HJ-CA View Post
In California...

Two people get divorced with a baby. Mom takes baby 2/3 of time, Dad 1/3. They agree on equal custody. They verbally agree to try to split all the child's bills 50/50(nothing written). They make very similar amounts. Dad might make a little more. Everything is fine for a year and a half. Mom starts having money trouble. Wants child support now. If Dad says I want 50/50 custody does he have to pay still? Can she seek back child support if there was never any written agreement on it?What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
Mom can file for child support and it will generally be backdated to the date of filing only - not before then.

Why is Dad only now wanting 50/50? Is it coincidental to Mom wanting child support?
__________________
*****************************


When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman

Quote:
Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo
  #4  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,155
What actual time share were they practicing when mom filed for a custody support change? What status quo had been established as to time share?
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!
  #5  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:00 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
When the child was young Mom actually wouldn't allow 50/50 even though the paper work stated it, saying the child was too young to be away from the Mom for very long. Custody has been close to 50/50 lately because of the causal agreement and swapping schedules. It would be one's word against the other how much time the child spends with each.
  #6  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by HJ-CA View Post
When the child was young Mom actually wouldn't allow 50/50 even though the paper work stated it, saying the child was too young to be away from the Mom for very long. Custody has been close to 50/50 lately because of the causal agreement and swapping schedules. It would be one's word against the other how much time the child spends with each.
what is the actual wording of the court order in regards to visitation?
  #7  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:10 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
They never went to court, the divorce paperwork just says "shared custody"
  #8  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by HJ-CA View Post
They never went to court, the divorce paperwork just says "shared custody"
was it signed by a judge?


i betted 9:10, doggie!!! where's my drink!
  #9  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:28 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
If that's normal then probably, I am not sure. This was a typical uncontested divorce.
  #10  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by HJ-CA View Post
If that's normal then probably, I am not sure. This was a typical uncontested divorce.
unfortunately, we are unable to do "probably". makes it harder to help, you know?


can you have dad sign in so we can clarify information?

third parties are harder to ask questions from. kind of like sending my dad in to my obgyn exam.
  #11  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,155
So does the 50% time share that dad is now filing to make formal represent the approximate status quo they have been sharing?
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!
  #12  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by nextwife View Post
So does the 50% time share that dad is now filing to make formal represent the approximate status quo they have been sharing?
I thought Mom had baby 2/3 of time?

(Per first post?)
__________________
*****************************


When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman

Quote:
Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo
  #13  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogmatique View Post
I thought Mom had baby 2/3 of time?

(Per first post?)
that's what the legal stranger said**************
  #14  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogmatique View Post
I thought Mom had baby 2/3 of time?

(Per first post?)
Yes, when they divorced. That may have changed over time.

"HJ-CA When the child was young Mom actually wouldn't allow 50/50 even though the paper work stated it, saying the child was too young to be away from the Mom for very long. Custody has been close to 50/50 lately because of the causal agreement and swapping schedules. It would be one's word against the other how much time the child spends with each."
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!

Last edited by nextwife; 11-05-2009 at 08:57 PM.
  #15  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsabellaSoriano View Post
was it signed by a judge?


i betted 9:10, doggie!!! where's my drink!
Smartypants
__________________
*****************************


When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman

Quote:
Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.