What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Iowa
I received papers on the 12th of January, my x husband wants to lower child support (which I do not mind) the last part of the paper states,
WHEREFORE, said Respondent prays that the Court enter an Order modifying the Decree of Dissolution of Marriage to order the Respondent pay support for two minor children, pursuant to his new decrease income and for such other relief as may be just and equitable in the premises.
In the origional I was awarded legal custody, visitation of his chosing ( he never chose to exercise it), the child support, I carry the health insurance and I get to claim the children on taxes.
I have two questions.
1) can anyone tell me what " and for such other relief as may be just and equitable in the premises." MIGHT mean?
2) when I first married the X husband I had hired a laywer "George" for problems pertaining to a previous x husband, I paid George and have papers stating that he is my laywer. I then paid George for my husband to adopt my children. We then divorced a few years later. George is representing my x, he says he cannot represent me because he represented him in the adoption.
My second question becomes, knowing he cannot represent me can he legally represent him since he was admittedly my lawyer first and I paid him when my x used him in the adoption?
I received papers on the 12th of January, my x husband wants to lower child support (which I do not mind) the last part of the paper states,
WHEREFORE, said Respondent prays that the Court enter an Order modifying the Decree of Dissolution of Marriage to order the Respondent pay support for two minor children, pursuant to his new decrease income and for such other relief as may be just and equitable in the premises.
In the origional I was awarded legal custody, visitation of his chosing ( he never chose to exercise it), the child support, I carry the health insurance and I get to claim the children on taxes.
I have two questions.
1) can anyone tell me what " and for such other relief as may be just and equitable in the premises." MIGHT mean?
2) when I first married the X husband I had hired a laywer "George" for problems pertaining to a previous x husband, I paid George and have papers stating that he is my laywer. I then paid George for my husband to adopt my children. We then divorced a few years later. George is representing my x, he says he cannot represent me because he represented him in the adoption.
My second question becomes, knowing he cannot represent me can he legally represent him since he was admittedly my lawyer first and I paid him when my x used him in the adoption?