Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Child Support : (Formerly part of Child Custody and Visitation.)
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Child Support

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 



Sign up for our Free Email Newsletter
For Email Marketing you can trust
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2007, 12:39 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 125

Disability vs. Child Support


What is the name of your state? Arizona

I have been physically separated from my stbx for 11 months now. He filed for divorce earlier this month. I have a 9 year old son that's not his and we have a 5 year old son together, who lives with his dad. On the divorce paperwork, he requested sole custody with visitation and no child support. I am disabled from a medmal incident in July 2005 that has left me incapable of working, even at Circle K or McDonald's. The disabilities have been thoroughly documented and are not at dispute.

I was told that my stbx can say he doesn't want child support for the 5 year old but the court always orders it in sole custody arrangements. I received a settlement from the medmal lawsuit but it is solely to provide for my daily care and future medical expenses.

Is it true that child support can be ordered from a parent incapable of working and doesn't have an income? Would changing the sole custody arrangement to joint fix this issue?

Thank you in advance,
K
  #2  
Old 03-28-2007, 12:56 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 282
Quote:
Originally Posted by JessiesGirl View Post
What is the name of your state? Arizona

I have been physically separated from my stbx for 11 months now. He filed for divorce earlier this month. I have a 9 year old son that's not his and we have a 5 year old son together, who lives with his dad. On the divorce paperwork, he requested sole custody with visitation and no child support. I am disabled from a medmal incident in July 2005 that has left me incapable of working, even at Circle K or McDonald's. The disabilities have been thoroughly documented and are not at dispute.

I was told that my stbx can say he doesn't want child support for the 5 year old but the court always orders it in sole custody arrangements. I received a settlement from the medmal lawsuit but it is solely to provide for my daily care and future medical expenses.

Is it true that child support can be ordered from a parent incapable of working and doesn't have an income? Would changing the sole custody arrangement to joint fix this issue?

Thank you in advance,
K
Arizona allows a deviation to CS based on the percentage of time the child spends with the CS obligor , also there is a state mandated self support reserve .

[url]http://www.supreme.state.az.us/dr/childsup/drguide.htm[/url]
  #3  
Old 03-28-2007, 01:05 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 10,182
[quote=JessiesGirl;1600194]What is the name of your state? Arizona

I have been physically separated from my stbx for 11 months now. He filed for divorce earlier this month. I have a 9 year old son that's not his and we have a 5 year old son together, who lives with his dad. On the divorce paperwork, he requested sole custody with visitation and no child support. I am disabled from a medmal incident in July 2005 that has left me incapable of working, even at Circle K or McDonald's. The disabilities have been thoroughly documented and are not at dispute.

I was told that my stbx can say he doesn't want child support for the 5 year old but the court always orders it in sole custody arrangements. I received a settlement from the medmal lawsuit but it is solely to provide for my daily care and future medical expenses.

Is it true that child support can be ordered from a parent incapable of working and doesn't have an income? Would changing the sole custody arrangement to joint fix this issue?

So in a nut shell, you are giving up custody of yet another child?
__________________
It is our unanimous opinion that you are damn right and it should be obvious to any moron that your (ex) (SO’s ex) (boss) (landlord) (local police) should be immediately (jailed) (fired) (reprimanded) (arrested) (demoted) (shot) (evicted).
In fact, you are so astonishingly correct in this matter, it will not surprise us one bit if you are offered a generous settlement, because, by golly, that’s just how it should be.

You Rock,
Love,
Us
  #4  
Old 03-28-2007, 08:39 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,962
[quote=Shay-Pari'e;1600203]
Quote:
Originally Posted by JessiesGirl View Post
What is the name of your state? Arizona

I have been physically separated from my stbx for 11 months now. He filed for divorce earlier this month. I have a 9 year old son that's not his and we have a 5 year old son together, who lives with his dad. On the divorce paperwork, he requested sole custody with visitation and no child support. I am disabled from a medmal incident in July 2005 that has left me incapable of working, even at Circle K or McDonald's. The disabilities have been thoroughly documented and are not at dispute.

I was told that my stbx can say he doesn't want child support for the 5 year old but the court always orders it in sole custody arrangements. I received a settlement from the medmal lawsuit but it is solely to provide for my daily care and future medical expenses.

Is it true that child support can be ordered from a parent incapable of working and doesn't have an income? Would changing the sole custody arrangement to joint fix this issue?

So in a nut shell, you are giving up custody of yet another child?
Excuse me Shay, but in every divorce, one parent usually ends up with primary custody, and it's not appropriate to chastise the parent who doesn't have custody. This mom is physically disabled. Many physical disabilities impair a parents mobility and ability to monitor their child. Her disability may make it VERY appropriate for NO children to be in her custody. If she's too impaired to work, she certainly could be too impaired to take care of a child, especially a young, very mobile child who needs a lot of supervision. Why is it wrong for dad to have custody of his child, and why does a dad having custody get interpreted as mom "giving up" custody? Dad has the same right to custody as mom!

Mom, your child is entitled to SS benefits if their parent is disabled. You can ask the court to consider the SS benefits off your work credits to be used in lieu of paying additional CS.
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!

Last edited by nextwife; 03-28-2007 at 08:43 AM.
  #5  
Old 03-28-2007, 10:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,915
[quote=Shay-Pari'e;1600203]
Quote:
Originally Posted by JessiesGirl View Post

So in a nut shell, you are giving up custody of yet another child?
Wow, so do you consider all fathers that dont have full custody of their children quitters too? Thats a pretty one-sided biased opinion.
__________________
Five, or six, ten people shall be made temporarily wretched because one person, unconsciously perhaps, yet supremely egotistic and selfish, has never learned to control his disposition and bridle his tongue. - James H. Aughey
  #6  
Old 04-18-2007, 10:10 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 125

Response


Thank you for your advice. I forgot about the self support reserve test. My stbx has a very successful dental lab and is not hurting financially at all (I guess I'm grateful that he's doing well, at least in that area, even though I don't get to benefit from all the hard work I did to help his business do so well over the years).

I am keeping my 9 year old son, and yes, I am letting my stbx have the 5 year old. I don't consider it "quitting" to let his dad be the primary caregiver. I am doing the 5 year old and my stbx a favor - dad now has a reason to be home every night instead of at the bar like he used to before we split. I miss my little guy so much but the only way I can see him now is if I go over there to the stbx's. He won't let me take the child because he said he's afraid I'll kidnap him. Please!!! That is a completely unreasonable accusation.

Anyway, thank you for understanding about the disability. It was a head injury caused by an ENT that screwed up a septoplasty (deviated septum). The head injury then caused a stroke and a hematoma with a hole in my skull that needed patched so I could live. The headaches that the septoplasty was to fix of course made them worse.

I have another question about equitable distribution posted regarding the divorce. I hope that fairness is put into play at least there. The rest of my life ain't so rosy so here's hoping for relief.

Kathy
  #7  
Old 04-19-2007, 07:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,962
Have you applied for SS benefits for your child? Many courts will consider the child's SS benefits ipaid to the CP in lieu of their payments, since it is support that comes from the NCPs work credits.
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!
  #8  
Old 04-25-2007, 05:24 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 125
No, I have not followed up on SS, but I will. Thanks for the advice.

K
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.