BelizeBreeze
Senior Member
that fact alone does not preclude a paternity test.The problem with your response it that many of the "duped men" were duped regarding children born of their marriage.
that fact alone does not preclude a paternity test.The problem with your response it that many of the "duped men" were duped regarding children born of their marriage.
A marriage doesn't strip a man the option of doing a paternity test.The problem with your response it that many of the "duped men" were duped regarding children born of their marriage.
And I'm sure that women everywhere...girlfriends, booty calls, one-night stands, and WIVES will be soooo open to submitting to paternity testing because their men should TRUST them, right??A marriage doesn't strip a man the option of doing a paternity test.
Darlin' - it only takes the kid and the dad. If they're married, presumably they have time with the kids. If they're not - they need to go through court anyway to establish paternity.And I'm sure that women everywhere...girlfriends, booty calls, one-night stands, and WIVES will be soooo open to submitting to paternity testing because their men should TRUST them, right??
That also is underhanded and sneaky. That would make him no better than her. When my ex mother-in-law blamed me for not having children, instead of blaming her son who didn't want any, she told me I should just let myself get pregnant. I guess that would also be okay, right?Darlin' - it only takes the kid and the dad. If they're married, presumably they have time with the kids. If they're not - they need to go through court anyway to establish paternity.
And I'm sure that women everywhere...girlfriends, booty calls, one-night stands, and WIVES will be soooo open to submitting to paternity testing because their men should TRUST them, right??
Since when did this thread become about you and your lack of children?That also is underhanded and sneaky. That would make him no better than her. When my ex mother-in-law blamed me for not having children, instead of blaming her son who didn't want any, she told me I should just let myself get pregnant. I guess that would also be okay, right?
Your smarta$$ attitude aside, I was attempting to make an analogy...two wrongs don't make a right. What is becoming of our society when people must resort to underhanded methods instead of being truthful and honest about things? So what if a man does go behind his wife's back and has paternity testing done, and what if it turns out theSince when did this thread become about you and your lack of children?
And those "women's organizations" strongly support women sleeping around and then lying about who the father is??????Then what does he do with the information? If this information gives the man an "out" clause, I guarantee that women's organizations all across the country would be in such an uproar you would hear the screaming from here to Venus!
Again, since when did THIS thread become about YOU?Your smarta$$ attitude aside, I was attempting to make an analogy...two wrongs don't make a right. What is becoming of our society when people must resort to underhanded methods instead of being truthful and honest about things? So what if a man does go behind his wife's back and has paternity testing done, and what if it turns out the
child(ren) are not his? Then what does he do with the information? If this information gives the man an "out" clause, I guarantee that women's organizations all across the country would be in such an uproar you would hear the screaming from here to Venus!
And every state ALLOWS a child "born of the marriage" to be disestablished as the child of the husband? IN the absence of another man claiming paternal rights?A marriage doesn't strip a man the option of doing a paternity test.
If you read my posts on this thread, you would see that I specifically said that I don't feel women should get away with paternity fraud, BUT if every man CHOOSES to believe everything "their" woman says, then that's HIS CHOICE. Just because he doesn't legally HAVE to take a paternity test in a marriage doesn't mean he COULDN'T and often shouldn't.And every state ALLOWS a child "born of the marriage" to be disestablished as the child of the husband? IN the absence of another man claiming paternal rights?
I look at it this way: a person who buys a house is entitled to a home inspection, but having the right to an inspection does NOT relieve the seller of liability if they "swear falsely" and commit fraud and deliberatly withhold important information. And a child is far more important than a house - so why should the parties be held to a LOWER standard as to their liability should they commit fraud?
The onus should NOT be on the man only to protect a child from having their biofather deliberately misrepresented!
MY point is that neither parent should have the RIGHT to CHOOSE to assign parentage to suit their desires. A child only has ONE biological father. And if someone other than the biodad is going to be raising the child as their own, there should need to be a formal adoption. THe parents should NOT have the right, either one, to CHOOSE to create a fraudulant birth certificate, and fraudulantly represent someone as the BIOparent who really is NOT.If you read my posts on this thread, you would see that I specifically said that I don't feel women should get away with paternity fraud, BUT if every man CHOOSES to believe everything "their" woman says, then that's HIS CHOICE. Just because he doesn't legally HAVE to take a paternity test in a marriage doesn't mean he COULDN'T and often shouldn't.