 | 
11-07-2009, 05:45 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
| | | Sued for back pay when support wasn't in divorce decree? If your divorce decree doesn't state you have to pay child support, can you, several years later, be expected to pay back child support?  | 
11-07-2009, 05:49 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,158
| | | What did the divorce decree state about child support, if anything?
__________________ Quote:
Quote:
DRTDEVL Don't worry... It only hurts the *first* time you agree with justalayman.
| | 
11-07-2009, 06:00 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by justalayman What did the divorce decree state about child support, if anything? | That there would be no chid support payments. | 
11-07-2009, 06:31 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: In the good old US of A
Posts: 13,778
| | | What about medical ,daycare , and the like ?
Those would be other forms of Child support .
__________________
By M : be careful and avoid entering any personal information into your reply (or in your "signature" that is included at the bottom of any message you write). Do not have the sig files contain your name, address, or any other identifying information. Though I must say, some of you have turned them into a minor art forum (i.e., witticisms, sayings, graphics, and so forth).
Last edited by BL; 11-07-2009 at 06:33 PM.
| 
11-07-2009, 07:51 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,589
| | | Either way custody and child support are fluid - they can always be modified.
One would think though that any future order would be backdated only to the date of filing.
__________________ ***************************** When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman Quote: | Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo | | 
11-07-2009, 08:01 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,158
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogmatique Either way custody and child support are fluid - they can always be modified.
One would think though that any future order would be backdated only to the date of filing. | I agree BUT if the decree specifically stated it as part of the decree, then the decree must be revisited and not simply allow the CS to be addressed as an outside and independent event.
The inclusion of no child support could have been part of a negotiated agreement with consideration given in exchange for that inclusion.
__________________ Quote:
Quote:
DRTDEVL Don't worry... It only hurts the *first* time you agree with justalayman.
| | 
11-07-2009, 08:23 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,589
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by justalayman I agree BUT if the decree specifically stated it as part of the decree, then the decree must be revisited and not simply allow the CS to be addressed as an outside and independent event.
The inclusion of no child support could have been part of a negotiated agreement with consideration given in exchange for that inclusion. | It would have to be some pretty substantial consideration but yes, ok, I can see that.
We must wait for OP to return 
__________________ ***************************** When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman Quote: | Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo | | 
11-08-2009, 12:06 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Washington
Posts: 111
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by justalayman I agree BUT if the decree specifically stated it as part of the decree, then the decree must be revisited and not simply allow the CS to be addressed as an outside and independent event.
The inclusion of no child support could have been part of a negotiated agreement with consideration given in exchange for that inclusion. | Different state of course but...my decree stated no child support (long story) however, when the agreed upon terms were not met, I was allowed to have the child support addressed and modified as an outside order, without having to address the original decree. | 
11-08-2009, 02:29 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,158
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Raisingmaddy Different state of course but...my decree stated no child support (long story) however, when the agreed upon terms were not met, I was allowed to have the child support addressed and modified as an outside order, without having to address the original decree. | but as you stated, the agreed upon terms were not met which means somebody was in breach of the order, which is also effectively a contract between the two divorcing parties.
until OP states the divorce decree has not been followed, what is in the decree is relevant.
__________________ Quote:
Quote:
DRTDEVL Don't worry... It only hurts the *first* time you agree with justalayman.
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.