Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Child Support : (Formerly part of Child Custody and Visitation.)
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Child Support

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-07-2009, 05:45 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2

Sued for back pay when support wasn't in divorce decree?


If your divorce decree doesn't state you have to pay child support, can you, several years later, be expected to pay back child support?
  #2  
Old 11-07-2009, 05:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,158
What did the divorce decree state about child support, if anything?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
DRTDEVL Don't worry... It only hurts the *first* time you agree with justalayman.
  #3  
Old 11-07-2009, 06:00 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by justalayman View Post
What did the divorce decree state about child support, if anything?
That there would be no chid support payments.
  #4  
Old 11-07-2009, 06:31 PM
BL BL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In the good old US of A
Posts: 13,778
What about medical ,daycare , and the like ?

Those would be other forms of Child support .
__________________
By M : be careful and avoid entering any personal information into your reply (or in your "signature" that is included at the bottom of any message you write). Do not have the sig files contain your name, address, or any other identifying information. Though I must say, some of you have turned them into a minor art forum (i.e., witticisms, sayings, graphics, and so forth).

Last edited by BL; 11-07-2009 at 06:33 PM.
  #5  
Old 11-07-2009, 07:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,589
Either way custody and child support are fluid - they can always be modified.

One would think though that any future order would be backdated only to the date of filing.
__________________
*****************************


When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman

Quote:
Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo
  #6  
Old 11-07-2009, 08:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogmatique View Post
Either way custody and child support are fluid - they can always be modified.

One would think though that any future order would be backdated only to the date of filing.
I agree BUT if the decree specifically stated it as part of the decree, then the decree must be revisited and not simply allow the CS to be addressed as an outside and independent event.

The inclusion of no child support could have been part of a negotiated agreement with consideration given in exchange for that inclusion.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
DRTDEVL Don't worry... It only hurts the *first* time you agree with justalayman.
  #7  
Old 11-07-2009, 08:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Weigh a pie...
Posts: 6,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by justalayman View Post
I agree BUT if the decree specifically stated it as part of the decree, then the decree must be revisited and not simply allow the CS to be addressed as an outside and independent event.

The inclusion of no child support could have been part of a negotiated agreement with consideration given in exchange for that inclusion.
It would have to be some pretty substantial consideration but yes, ok, I can see that.

We must wait for OP to return
__________________
*****************************


When you can't bear something but it goes on anyway, the person who survives isn't you anymore; you've changed and become someone else, a new person, the one who did bear it after all.
— Austin Grossman

Quote:
Salagadoola mechicka boola bibbidi-bobbidi-boo
  #8  
Old 11-08-2009, 12:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 111
Send a message via Yahoo to Raisingmaddy
Quote:
Originally Posted by justalayman View Post
I agree BUT if the decree specifically stated it as part of the decree, then the decree must be revisited and not simply allow the CS to be addressed as an outside and independent event.

The inclusion of no child support could have been part of a negotiated agreement with consideration given in exchange for that inclusion.
Different state of course but...my decree stated no child support (long story) however, when the agreed upon terms were not met, I was allowed to have the child support addressed and modified as an outside order, without having to address the original decree.
  #9  
Old 11-08-2009, 02:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I don't know. The guys with the keys won't say. I think it's top secret info.
Posts: 10,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raisingmaddy View Post
Different state of course but...my decree stated no child support (long story) however, when the agreed upon terms were not met, I was allowed to have the child support addressed and modified as an outside order, without having to address the original decree.
but as you stated, the agreed upon terms were not met which means somebody was in breach of the order, which is also effectively a contract between the two divorcing parties.

until OP states the divorce decree has not been followed, what is in the decree is relevant.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
DRTDEVL Don't worry... It only hurts the *first* time you agree with justalayman.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.