I have been contacted by a law firm multiple times saying they have tried to process serve me regarding a civil suit filed on behalf of a retail store. They never actually served me (basically they can't find me), but I finally called them back to find out what all the voicemails they left were about. I did have an outstanding credit balance from 2006 with this retail store, but it had been long forgotten. I asked them how a debt from 2006 is being visited now and how it has not passed a statue of limitations or similar time-frame for them to be able to legally pursue action against me since it is now 10 years later, and they claim that since the debt was not charged off until 2013 that they still have this as an option. They have threatened to sue me for the balance, interest, and legal fees, and have threatened wage garnishment and levies against me.
So my questions are:
1. Is it true that they can actually pursue any of this action against me on a debt that is 10 years old?
2. If they can pursue action, is it best for me to accept their settlement offer (just over the original balance) or fight it?
3. They sent me a contract with a payment arrangement offer, but I am hesitant to agree to it at this point because I have no clue if they can actually do this. Should I accept this offer?
Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
So my questions are:
1. Is it true that they can actually pursue any of this action against me on a debt that is 10 years old?
2. If they can pursue action, is it best for me to accept their settlement offer (just over the original balance) or fight it?
3. They sent me a contract with a payment arrangement offer, but I am hesitant to agree to it at this point because I have no clue if they can actually do this. Should I accept this offer?
Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.