• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Home owner Refused to pay

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

mvsconst

Junior Member
What is the name of your state?California
I'm the plaintiff and this case was filed by me 7 months ago.
I'm suing 2 defendants who are the owners of the property I remodeled.
Anyway, they both missed the first CMC conferance.
Now a new CMC has been sched.
I sent them request for interrogatories and admissions set 1, set 2, & set 3, 2 months ago with no answers.
I just sent them again for the second time and the mail was returned,refused.
I did the normal service by mail thing and have all that.
Now my ? is; Can I file for summary Judgement on the grounds of the defendants refusal to partisipate;If not what can I do?
At the CMC can I request to have the Request for admissions be admitted to evidence?
Thanks for Your time
 


divgradcurl

Senior Member
Can I file for summary Judgement on the grounds of the defendants refusal to partisipate;If not what can I do?
No, but you could file a motion to compel -- then if they continue to ignore your discovery requests, they could be held in contempt or sanctioned by the court.

California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 2023(b):

"(b) To the extent authorized by the section governing any
particular discovery method or any other provision of this article,
the court, after notice to any affected party, person, or attorney,
and after opportunity for hearing, may impose the following sanctions
against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery
process.
(1) The court may impose a monetary sanction ordering that one
engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, or any attorney
advising that conduct, or both pay the reasonable expenses, including
attorney's fees, incurred by anyone as a result of that conduct.
The court may also impose this sanction on one unsuccessfully
asserting that another has engaged in the misuse of the discovery
process, or on any attorney who advised that assertion, or on both.
If a monetary sanction is authorized by any provision of this
article, the court shall impose that sanction unless it finds that
the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification
or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction
unjust.
(2) The court may impose an issue sanction ordering that
designated facts shall be taken as established in the action in
accordance with the claim of the party adversely affected by the
misuse of the discovery process. The court may also impose an issue
sanction by an order prohibiting any party engaging in the misuse of
the discovery process from supporting or opposing designated claims
or defenses.
(3) The court may impose an evidence sanction by an order
prohibiting any party engaging in the misuse of the discovery process
from introducing designated matters in evidence.
(4) The court may impose a terminating sanction by one of the
following orders:
(A) An order striking out the pleadings or parts of the pleadings
of any party engaging in the misuse of the discovery process.
(B) An order staying further proceedings by that party until an
order for discovery is obeyed.
(C) An order dismissing the action, or any part of the action, of
that party.
(D) An order rendering a judgment by default against that party.
(5) The court may impose a contempt sanction by an order treating
the misuse of the discovery process as a contempt of court.
(c) A request for a sanction shall, in the notice of motion,
identify every person, party, and attorney against whom the sanction
is sought, and specify the type of sanction sought. The notice of
motion shall be supported by a memorandum of points and authorities,
and accompanied by a declaration setting forth facts supporting the
amount of any monetary sanction sought."
 

badapple40

Senior Member
Actually, you can file a motion to have the admissions deemed admitted and established conclusively for all purposes -- and depending on whether and how well you drafted the admissions, it may well be that the admissions support your motion for summary judgment. If that is the case, well, then the other side is toast.
 

mvsconst

Junior Member
If admissions are admitted????

mvsconst said:
What is the name of your state?California
I'm the plaintiff and this case was filed by me 7 months ago.
I'm suing 2 defendants who are the owners of the property I remodeled.
Anyway, they both missed the first CMC conferance.
Now a new CMC has been sched.
I sent them request for interrogatories and admissions set 1, set 2, & set 3, 2 months ago with no answers.
I just sent them again for the second time and the mail was returned,refused.
I did the normal service by mail thing and have all that.
Now my ? is; Can I file for summary Judgement on the grounds of the defendants refusal to partisipate;If not what can I do?
At the CMC can I request to have the Request for admissions be admitted to evidence?
Thanks for Your time

What happens if the admissions Motion are admitted as evidence?
What will I have to do next?
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top