Thank your for your candor Princess.
Me? Never in New York state. But for better than four decades in a place a few mountain ranges east of your scienic Long Island.
. . . I have been told NY wont garnish civil judgments
That comes to a round figure of two. (1) You, the Princes, and (2) the hapless and confused judgment creditor to whom the Princess said it was so.
and I cant find anything supporting NY garnishment for out of state judgments.
Well you’ll just have to keep looking. Because once an out of state/foreign judgment is registered in New York it is treated in all respects as a domestic judgment. In fact the process of registering the foreign judgment is often referred to domesticating it.
_______________________
HOWEVER, dear Princess, the question of whether or not a judgment creditor can garnish wages in New York (which he can because expressly allowed under NY CPLR Section 5231 “Income execution”
is moot as far as concerns this here thread. Why because….
What really happened with our OP (fmoadab) is that he secured his judgment in New Jersey where his former tenant resides. He then attempted to register it as a foreign judgment in New York where the judgment debtor is employed.
BUT instead of the NY clerk telling him that he couldn’t garnish on a New York judgment taken by default, the clerk denied him the right to register his New Jersey judgment in New York because it was taken by default.
And that is because Section 5401 of New York’s Civil Practice Law & Remedies Code expressly denies the registration/domestication of any foreign when
“obtained by default in appearance, or by confession of judgment”. In other words OP never even reached first base w ith the NY clerk, let alone secure the issuance of a writ of execution for purposes of garnishment.
_____________
So how about that Princiess? We have been bouncing back and forth in here over the question of New York garnishment laws when we should have been wrestling with full faith and credit and asking how come New York is able to ignore the U. S.Constitution by adopting its Section 5401.
Not to mention arbitarily discriminating between classes of judgment creditors distinguishable only because one group didn't hog tie their debtor and drag him into the courtroom.