I was wondering if this is a valid claim? Saying in civil court the plaintiff must be alleging "personal injuries or damages" and if not they have no standing, thus the court hasn't any "Subject Matter Jurisdiction".
Also does it say in the Constitution that government is established "to maintain and protect individual rights" ?
So since challenging a ticket is going to civil court, there must be a valid "Cause of Action" and a valid "Cause of Action" would be the Plaintiff alleging personal injury or damage?
Here is a video from someone on Youtube speaking about Subject Matter Jurisdiction and how it's a legal loop hole since challenging a ticket is in civil court and the plaintiff is not alleging personal injury or damages.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL70L...next=1&index=9
http://freedom-school.com/marc-steve...ic-tickets.pdf
Edit/Delete Message
Also does it say in the Constitution that government is established "to maintain and protect individual rights" ?
So since challenging a ticket is going to civil court, there must be a valid "Cause of Action" and a valid "Cause of Action" would be the Plaintiff alleging personal injury or damage?
Here is a video from someone on Youtube speaking about Subject Matter Jurisdiction and how it's a legal loop hole since challenging a ticket is in civil court and the plaintiff is not alleging personal injury or damages.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL70L...next=1&index=9
http://freedom-school.com/marc-steve...ic-tickets.pdf
Edit/Delete Message