toastnjelly4all
Member
What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? WA
What will a superior court judge do if it is proven that a Plaintiff submitted false information (outright lies) and an altered document in order to obtain a temporary restraining order, and filed a lawsuit based on this same information? In this case, Plaintiffs claimed defendants blocked all their access to their property. This was not true, the plaintiffs have a road abutting the entire length of their property. Plaintiffs claimed that there are existing roadways, blocked by the defendants, which they used for 30 years to access their land. These roads do not exist, they are platted. After having the TRO served by a sheriff, who told us that if we did anything to hinder the Plaintiffs we would be arrested, the plaintiffs proceeded to clear our land. We therefore were forced to allow them to come onto our land and build a road across it. This road connected the county right of way to our private driveway, making it a public access. We had a lawyer appear the next day, and the TRO was set aside, and the judge ordered all activities on the disputed property to stop, and that a hearing could be expediated if necessary. The plaintiffs have waited 10 months to set a court hearing. They have committed crimes against us personally, our property, and the court. Will the judge send this off to the prosecuting atty?
What will a superior court judge do if it is proven that a Plaintiff submitted false information (outright lies) and an altered document in order to obtain a temporary restraining order, and filed a lawsuit based on this same information? In this case, Plaintiffs claimed defendants blocked all their access to their property. This was not true, the plaintiffs have a road abutting the entire length of their property. Plaintiffs claimed that there are existing roadways, blocked by the defendants, which they used for 30 years to access their land. These roads do not exist, they are platted. After having the TRO served by a sheriff, who told us that if we did anything to hinder the Plaintiffs we would be arrested, the plaintiffs proceeded to clear our land. We therefore were forced to allow them to come onto our land and build a road across it. This road connected the county right of way to our private driveway, making it a public access. We had a lawyer appear the next day, and the TRO was set aside, and the judge ordered all activities on the disputed property to stop, and that a hearing could be expediated if necessary. The plaintiffs have waited 10 months to set a court hearing. They have committed crimes against us personally, our property, and the court. Will the judge send this off to the prosecuting atty?