What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? PA
We're two weeks away from a settlement on a new condo. The condo is still under construction, with just minor cosmetic work remaining. We've been working with Comcast and Verizon to get service established, but both are reporting that the building was improperly constructed. Specifically (according to both carriers), there are no conduits from the carriers' street lines into each unit. Instead, there appears to be coaxial cable running to one end unit in the building. Both carriers state that this is insufficient, because they can not punch through interior walls to run service.
The builder reports that the building is constructed just fine and that both carriers are perfectly capable of providing service.
In comparing our building against other buildings with identical floorplans that are still under construction, I see an obvious visual difference. Other buildings have a series of conduits (one for each unit) terminating outside, while ours does not. So on the surface, it would appear that the carriers are correct. Both carriers report that this issue has come up with several (but not all) other buildings in the development, and in each case, the HOA refused to allow them to make the necessary changes to the exterior.
First question: Is the builder under any obligation to work with Comcast and/or Verizon to resolve this issue? If it makes a difference, both carriers have informed me that we are not even able to obtain basic phone service at the address.
Second question: Settlement is still several weeks away. Both the sales agent and the builder made verbal statements that Verizon and Comcast were both available. Should we refrain from settling until this issue is resolved?
We're two weeks away from a settlement on a new condo. The condo is still under construction, with just minor cosmetic work remaining. We've been working with Comcast and Verizon to get service established, but both are reporting that the building was improperly constructed. Specifically (according to both carriers), there are no conduits from the carriers' street lines into each unit. Instead, there appears to be coaxial cable running to one end unit in the building. Both carriers state that this is insufficient, because they can not punch through interior walls to run service.
The builder reports that the building is constructed just fine and that both carriers are perfectly capable of providing service.
In comparing our building against other buildings with identical floorplans that are still under construction, I see an obvious visual difference. Other buildings have a series of conduits (one for each unit) terminating outside, while ours does not. So on the surface, it would appear that the carriers are correct. Both carriers report that this issue has come up with several (but not all) other buildings in the development, and in each case, the HOA refused to allow them to make the necessary changes to the exterior.
First question: Is the builder under any obligation to work with Comcast and/or Verizon to resolve this issue? If it makes a difference, both carriers have informed me that we are not even able to obtain basic phone service at the address.
Second question: Settlement is still several weeks away. Both the sales agent and the builder made verbal statements that Verizon and Comcast were both available. Should we refrain from settling until this issue is resolved?