Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Condos and Co-Ops

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2007, 10:11 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2

California wildfire victim needs help


What is the name of your state? - California
I've lost my house in a recent California wild fire month and half ago - completely destroyed.
My house was a single unit detached house, belonging to the HOA.
The legal status is - a condominium with a separate interest, which includes a house and a yard. The grad deed says about that separate interest - house, year, airspace above.
I pay taxes for the land.
HOA rules of restrictions declares common area as
"Common Area" shall mean and refer to all portions of the Condominium property not located within a Living Unit or Yard.
My house has (had) a zero feet border.
Here is the problem.
The HOA does not want us to change anything - the house has to be built on exactly same footprint, same height, same dimensions, etc.
We want to move our house away 4ft from the border, according to the zoning regulations - to have more control in a case of emergency. Also, we want to make some changes in exterior, but keep overall look and feel of the old house. The footprint will be a bit different.
They have a lawyer, which sent us a letter, saying that the only thing, which we own, is a three dimensional size of our old house, everything else is a common area,
We believe, that is not true, since we have a separate interest in grand deed, their own rules of restrictions exclude house and yard from common area, plus we pay real estate taxes.
We're planning to sue them to confirm our rights, however they say that by California civil code 1369.510 et. seq. we obligated to enter a stage of negotiations, which could take up to 30 days to accept and another 90 days to negotiate.
Questions:
1. Is there a chance, than they could be right - my area of separate interest, real estate taxes, etc is in fact a common area?
2. Is there a way to go directly to the court - bypass the negotiation stage?
3. What would be the best strategy to force them to comply with the law without long and expensive legal debates?

Second set of questions.

About a year ago, our HOA has partially stopped watering a hill behind our house - to save money.
The dry brush came as close to our border as 3ft. That was the main reason why our neighbor's houses and our house got burned. The fire did not get into the watered areas - only to our dried area.
As far as I understand, I can sue them for damages. However, I will not be able to estimate the amount of the loss, which will not be covered by insurance for another couple of months. By that time, most of the evidence will be gone (rainy season in San Diego).
Of course, I do have pictures and video of dry area and shut off sprinkler system.
Questions:
1.Should I start the case immediately, or wait until I have an estimate of things not covered by insurance.
2. Can I open a case of criminal negligence - deliberately exposing some houses at high fire risk, if so, what would be the best approach to do so.
Thanks in advance.
Your help will be very much appreciated.
  #2  
Old 12-03-2007, 12:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by olegy View Post
What is the name of your state? - California
I've lost my house in a recent California wild fire month and half ago - completely destroyed.
My house was a single unit detached house, belonging to the HOA.
The legal status is - a condominium with a separate interest, which includes a house and a yard. The grad deed says about that separate interest - house, year, airspace above.
I pay taxes for the land.
HOA rules of restrictions declares common area as
"Common Area" shall mean and refer to all portions of the Condominium property not located within a Living Unit or Yard.
My house has (had) a zero feet border.
Here is the problem.
The HOA does not want us to change anything - the house has to be built on exactly same footprint, same height, same dimensions, etc.
We want to move our house away 4ft from the border, according to the zoning regulations - to have more control in a case of emergency. Also, we want to make some changes in exterior, but keep overall look and feel of the old house. The footprint will be a bit different.
They have a lawyer, which sent us a letter, saying that the only thing, which we own, is a three dimensional size of our old house, everything else is a common area,
We believe, that is not true, since we have a separate interest in grand deed, their own rules of restrictions exclude house and yard from common area, plus we pay real estate taxes.
We're planning to sue them to confirm our rights, however they say that by California civil code 1369.510 et. seq. we obligated to enter a stage of negotiations, which could take up to 30 days to accept and another 90 days to negotiate.
Questions:
1. Is there a chance, than they could be right - my area of separate interest, real estate taxes, etc is in fact a common area?
2. Is there a way to go directly to the court - bypass the negotiation stage?
3. What would be the best strategy to force them to comply with the law without long and expensive legal debates?

Second set of questions.

About a year ago, our HOA has partially stopped watering a hill behind our house - to save money.
The dry brush came as close to our border as 3ft. That was the main reason why our neighbor's houses and our house got burned. The fire did not get into the watered areas - only to our dried area.
As far as I understand, I can sue them for damages. However, I will not be able to estimate the amount of the loss, which will not be covered by insurance for another couple of months. By that time, most of the evidence will be gone (rainy season in San Diego).
Of course, I do have pictures and video of dry area and shut off sprinkler system.
Questions:
1.Should I start the case immediately, or wait until I have an estimate of things not covered by insurance.
2. Can I open a case of criminal negligence - deliberately exposing some houses at high fire risk, if so, what would be the best approach to do so.
Thanks in advance.
Your help will be very much appreciated.
**A: I suggest you hire a RE attorney right away.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.