Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Condos and Co-Ops

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2005, 01:29 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1

HOA fees sq footage and expenditures


What is the name of your state? Georgia

I live in a condo that has three phases. The first is a 100 year old building that was occupied between one and two years before the second phase (new construction) was occupied. I was among the first in the second phase and have been here two years. Our HOA fees have just gone up due to a lack of reserve funds. We had a meeting to discuss the new budget and something was said that I did not think about at the time.

Phase one emptied all reserves into their building prior to Phase two being completed. It was explained that this was because they put in the money and should go to them. At the time I thought that made sense and was fair. The problem I have is that we in the new phases pay considerably more in fees than Phase one. It is based on square footage and our phase pays more but we all share the money.

My question is did HOA set a precedent that those who put in more money deserve more benefit from funds that will be into reserve? If not is there any way to get rid of this square footage garbage and have everybody pay the same? I was told this was enacted by the logic that if you can afford more condo, than you can afford more in fees, benefit or not. Luxury tax I suppose.

Sorry to be so long winded. Thank you for any help.
  #2  
Old 02-13-2005, 01:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by geoegia
What is the name of your state? Georgia

I live in a condo that has three phases. The first is a 100 year old building that was occupied between one and two years before the second phase (new construction) was occupied. I was among the first in the second phase and have been here two years. Our HOA fees have just gone up due to a lack of reserve funds. We had a meeting to discuss the new budget and something was said that I did not think about at the time.

Phase one emptied all reserves into their building prior to Phase two being completed. It was explained that this was because they put in the money and should go to them. At the time I thought that made sense and was fair. The problem I have is that we in the new phases pay considerably more in fees than Phase one. It is based on square footage and our phase pays more but we all share the money.

My question is did HOA set a precedent that those who put in more money deserve more benefit from funds that will be into reserve? If not is there any way to get rid of this square footage garbage and have everybody pay the same? I was told this was enacted by the logic that if you can afford more condo, than you can afford more in fees, benefit or not. Luxury tax I suppose.

Sorry to be so long winded. Thank you for any help.
**A: your CC&R's rule until such time it is legally amended to follow a different method for calculating reserves etc. based on percentage of interest.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.