Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Condos and Co-Ops

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2008, 05:22 PM
urs urs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1
Angry

Renting my condo


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California

My homeowner's assoication has a maximum requirement of units that can be rental. This was not in place when I first bought my condo, but had subsequently been passed after living there a few years. I have since been on a list to become a rental unit for almost a year now. Selling is not an option, because the property value is way lower than the remaining balance of my loab. Is there a way to get around this rule? I thought that HOA only had control over the outside of the unit and not the inside. If I want to rent my own condo, I should be able to!
  #2  
Old 11-15-2008, 06:43 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1
Instead of posting a new thread I will post a related question.

My condo board (in Virginia) is now pushing for us to adopt rental restrictions for our 110 unit building. They are claiming that a new law was instituted with the mortgage "rescue" bill that restricts conventional mortgages for Condos unless the condo building is over 70% owner-occupied. They also claim that if the condo goes below 50% owner-occupied then the only way to buy a condo in that building is with all cash.

This does not seem right to me. Does anyone know where I can read these new laws? Google hasn't gotten me far.

FHA/VA rules still allow for mortgages if a condo is more than 50% owner-occupied, but I don't know how accessible those loans are to the general public.
  #3  
Old 11-18-2008, 07:22 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2
Thumbs down

Ironic


I just registered for this site to post the same Question. My situation is a little bit diffrent then yours though Ann. I bought my condo 5 years ago here in
California knowing that I wasn't able to rent it out however the association told me at the time it was 78% owner occupied and that it needed to be 80 % owner occupied to be able to rent it out. Well low and behold 5 years later it is still 78% owner occupied . I owe 153,000 and there are foreclosures around 90,000. So selling isn't an option for me either. What is really irritating to me though is if you purchased a condo before 1997 then you are able to rent them out. What are my options? Any Help would be greatly aprreciated
  #4  
Old 11-19-2008, 10:54 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by urs View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California

My homeowner's assoication has a maximum requirement of units that can be rental. This was not in place when I first bought my condo, but had subsequently been passed after living there a few years. I have since been on a list to become a rental unit for almost a year now. Selling is not an option, because the property value is way lower than the remaining balance of my loab. Is there a way to get around this rule? I thought that HOA only had control over the outside of the unit and not the inside. If I want to rent my own condo, I should be able to!
**A: you have not provided enough details.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.