 | 
02-11-2005, 02:23 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2
| | Water damage, Concealed Plumbing What is the name of your state? California
Some shower plumbing that is inside a wall leaked, and caused water damage to the unit below. The wall is within my condo unit, and it is not between units. I want to determine whether the repair cost of the plumbing and damage to the unit below is my responsibility or the HOA's responsibility.
Is the plumbing in the space inside the interior walls considered common area?
Thanks! | 
02-11-2005, 03:13 PM
| | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Jump1 What is the name of your state? California
Some shower plumbing that is inside a wall leaked, and caused water damage to the unit below. The wall is within my condo unit, and it is not between units. I want to determine whether the repair cost of the plumbing and damage to the unit below is my responsibility or the HOA's responsibility.
Is the plumbing in the space inside the interior walls considered common area?
Thanks! | What do the CCRs say about this? | 
02-11-2005, 11:48 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2000 Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
| | | Dat's da million dolla question. | 
02-12-2005, 04:38 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2
| | Arrr...
I re-re-read the CC&R and discovered a portion I had not come across before! I had skipped the end of a long paragraph, which contained the crucial definition.
Unfortunately, it looks like I may be out for the amount of the repairs.
Section: Responsibility of Assoc. reads:
The Association shall provide for repair of the following ... utility installations within the Project wherever located (EXCEPT the Outlets thereof when located within a Condominium Unit. By way of Example, and not limitation, an "Outlet" shall mean any portion of a utility facility which is located in an electrical or wiring box or panel and any pipe or other utility facility from the point at which it is reasonably accessible from within an Owner's Condominium Unit. More specifically, the term "Outlet" shall mean the point at which any utility facility can be serviced without the need for destructive entry into the wall, floors, ceilings or any portion of the Common Area.
I had to break the ceiling below to locate the leak, but the leak itself was fixed without damaging the shower wall. | 
02-12-2005, 06:29 PM
| | | | I'm adding to my list of reasons to never buy a condo. | 
06-04-2005, 10:18 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3
| | So, how was this finally resolved? The reason I ask is because the same thing happened to me (I'm in Virginia) but there is a wrinkle. I had an overflow valve gasket inside the wall (which is not a common element or is it?) go bad causing water to leak into the downstairs unit. I contacted the HOA who told me that it isn't their problem (figures!). The downstairs unit's owner was a complete PIA about it and took me for a ride. Rather than get into an expensive lawsuit with him (he threatened me with one but I'm a poor grad student and can't afford anything like that) I paid for his repair expenses and am now wondering if there is anyone that I can recover from. The wrinkle is that I contacted the former owner and he told me the exact same thing happened three years (do statute of limitations issues arise here and, if so, which ones?) ago and the HOA paid to fix everything. I'm wondering if because of this I can go after the HOA or the contractor who botched the job? Can anyone shed any light on this? :-) | 
06-04-2005, 11:19 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2000 Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by gmuguy The reason I ask is because the same thing happened to me (I'm in Virginia) but there is a wrinkle. I had an overflow valve gasket inside the wall (which is not a common element or is it?) go bad causing water to leak into the downstairs unit. I contacted the HOA who told me that it isn't their problem (figures!). The downstairs unit's owner was a complete PIA about it and took me for a ride. Rather than get into an expensive lawsuit with him (he threatened me with one but I'm a poor grad student and can't afford anything like that) I paid for his repair expenses and am now wondering if there is anyone that I can recover from. The wrinkle is that I contacted the former owner and he told me the exact same thing happened three years (do statute of limitations issues arise here and, if so, which ones?) ago and the HOA paid to fix everything. I'm wondering if because of this I can go after the HOA or the contractor who botched the job? Can anyone shed any light on this? :-) |
**A: how much did the repair cost you and when was it done? | 
06-04-2005, 01:47 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3
| | Cost me about a grand ($1K) -- which to a grad student is big bucks but an attorney would probably laugh at it. Assuming I have a legal leg to stand on perhaps Small Claims Court would be an appropriate venue. However, if I took that course of action wouldn't there be the possibility of the other party getting an attorney and promoting the case to a higher Court or otherwise make my life hell and potentially countersue me?
Repair was completed in April, 2005. | 
06-04-2005, 11:00 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2000 Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by gmuguy Cost me about a grand ($1K) -- which to a grad student is big bucks but an attorney would probably laugh at it. Assuming I have a legal leg to stand on perhaps Small Claims Court would be an appropriate venue. However, if I took that course of action wouldn't there be the possibility of the other party getting an attorney and promoting the case to a higher Court or otherwise make my life hell and potentially countersue me?
Repair was completed in April, 2005. | **A: drop it.
You may spend $5000 in legal fees and time to chase $1000. That's pretzel logic. | 
06-04-2005, 11:41 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3
| | Hmmmm... Agreed, you have an excellent point but are the potential downside risks I mentioned realistic? You're an attorney and can say so...I'm just thinking out loud... If the potential downside isn't that scary or uncertain it may be worth it for the principle alone... | 
06-05-2005, 10:13 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2000 Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by gmuguy Agreed, you have an excellent point but are the potential downside risks I mentioned realistic? You're an attorney and can say so...I'm just thinking out loud... If the potential downside isn't that scary or uncertain it may be worth it for the principle alone... |
**A: you have hijacked someone else's thread. | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM.