Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Construction & Renovation

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2009, 04:16 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
Question

Defect discovered after 7 years


I am in Illinois and had my home built 7 years ago without any problems. About a year ago a crack appeared in my living room ceiling. Over the year the crack has gradually grown larger and one side has started to move downward. I have a home inspector review it today and he discovered that the joists in the ceiling were never nailed to the cross joist and are now sliding down.

I contacted the builder, since he is still building homes in the area, and he told me that it was not his problem and that my warranty had expired. He said he would send over someone to fix it at my expense if that is what I wanted to do. Do I have any rights here? It would certainly seem that forgetting to nail down a framing structure of the home would be a builders defect.
  #2  
Old 07-23-2009, 04:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by home_guy View Post
Do I have any rights here? It would certainly seem that forgetting to nail down a framing structure of the home would be a builders defect.
Actually, have some pretty good rights. The SOL (Statute of Limitations) for construction defects in Illinois is '4 yrs from discovery of defect and discovery within 10 yrs of substantial completion'.
I strongly suggest you get a local attorney to contact the builder on your behalf.

735 ILCS 5/13‑214:
Construction ‑ Design management and supervision. As used in this Section "person" means any individual, any business or legal entity, or any body politic.
(a) Actions based upon tort, contract or otherwise against any person for an act or omission of such person in the design, planning, supervision, observation or management of construction, or construction of an improvement to real property shall be commenced within 4 years from the time the person bringing an action, or his or her privity, knew or should reasonably have known of such act or omission. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, contract actions against a surety on a payment or performance bond shall be commenced, if at all, within the same time limitation applicable to the bond principal.
(b) No action based upon tort, contract or otherwise may be brought against any person for an act or omission of such person in the design, planning, supervision, observation or management of construction, or construction of an improvement to real property after 10 years have elapsed from the time of such act or omission. However, any person who discovers such act or omission prior to expiration of 10 years from the time of such act or omission shall in no event have less than 4 years to bring an action as provided in subsection (a) of this Section. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, contract actions against a surety on a payment or performance bond shall be commenced, if at all, within the same time limitation applicable to the bond principal.
(c) If a person otherwise entitled to bring an action could not have brought such action within the limitation periods herein solely because such person was under the age of 18 years, or a person with a developmental disability or a person with mental illness, then the limitation periods herein shall not begin to run until the person attains the age of 18 years, or the disability is removed.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!

Last edited by JETX; 07-23-2009 at 04:57 PM.
  #3  
Old 07-23-2009, 06:00 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2
That's good news. Thanks for the help!
  #4  
Old 07-27-2009, 06:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Nail that sob builder.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.