Brenda Ferraro
Junior Member
What is the name of your state? California
This is in regards to 2 properties.
The 1st is on a higher street. The original owners put in a 6' high wall that extends 100' across the property - on top of an already existing 4' wall built on the property line by the original subdividers 40 years ago. This makes the current wall 10' high and 100' across. The higher property then put in soil up to the wall as well as a pool, trees, scrubs and concrete. Although the owner got permits for the pool, no permits can be found for the wall.
The lower property owners noticed that the wall was leaning 4 1/2 inches off center. In subsequent inspections the leaning is getting worse. The lower property owners had contractors come out to look at the wall (which is now leaning 9 3/4 inches). The contractors said that the wall is not a retaining wall, just a block wall set up on an already existing wall. There is rebar set inside but no concrete. It was not built to code even for 1967. The contractors indicate that the wall is coming down.
The upper property owner refused to cooperate and will not incur any costs for the wall even though it's his property that benefits, and his property that will fall into the lower yard should the wall fall. Does anyone have any experience in a matter similar to this? Since the wall was built by the original owners of the upper property it would appear the current owner would be responsible for the wall. Any thoughts?
This is in regards to 2 properties.
The 1st is on a higher street. The original owners put in a 6' high wall that extends 100' across the property - on top of an already existing 4' wall built on the property line by the original subdividers 40 years ago. This makes the current wall 10' high and 100' across. The higher property then put in soil up to the wall as well as a pool, trees, scrubs and concrete. Although the owner got permits for the pool, no permits can be found for the wall.
The lower property owners noticed that the wall was leaning 4 1/2 inches off center. In subsequent inspections the leaning is getting worse. The lower property owners had contractors come out to look at the wall (which is now leaning 9 3/4 inches). The contractors said that the wall is not a retaining wall, just a block wall set up on an already existing wall. There is rebar set inside but no concrete. It was not built to code even for 1967. The contractors indicate that the wall is coming down.
The upper property owner refused to cooperate and will not incur any costs for the wall even though it's his property that benefits, and his property that will fall into the lower yard should the wall fall. Does anyone have any experience in a matter similar to this? Since the wall was built by the original owners of the upper property it would appear the current owner would be responsible for the wall. Any thoughts?
Last edited: