Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Consumer Bankruptcy : Chapter 7, Chapter 13, Protection From Claims of Creditors
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Consumer Bankruptcy

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-07-2001, 06:37 PM
JohnB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

I have a friend who talked with a lawyer today and the lawyer said it would be best to file Chapter 7. The majority of her debt is unsecured, I'd say at least 95% is unsecured. She does however own a mobile home and was told that she could keep it? She has a co-signer and was told that he is entitled to at least 1/2 of the equity in the home, therefore the homestead rule of less than 5,000 went into effect. My ?? is she was told that her co-signer would be protected even after filing 7? She was also told that she could keep a checking account? I thought you would have to close an account out? Thank you**************.
  #2  
Old 03-07-2001, 11:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,061
You are allowed to exempt up to $96,000 in assets for a chapter 7 bankruptcy. If the home and any other assets are worth less than the exemption value, there is no reason for any changes. And if she plans to give up the home as part of the bankruptcy, the co-signer should go to the mortgage holder and remove themself from the mortgage contract. This will probably trigger an automatic foreclosure which would happen anyway. Unless the co-signer has been making half to the home payments, he has no claim to any equity in the home. And there are no provisions in the bankruptcy code concerning checking accounts other than the average monthly balance will be listed as an exemption in the bankruptcy.
__________________
If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me.

No private messages, I do not reply to them.
  #3  
Old 03-08-2001, 12:04 AM
JohnB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Racer72


Racer, she told me that the lawyer told her that in the state of SC that the co-signer is consider a co-owner and is entitled to half of the equity in the home. She wants to keep the home and says that with the co-signer being on the papers that it brings her below the state exemption of 5,000 equity in the home. She was told that she would keep paying on the Mobile home just like she always has as long as the payments remain current. Does this sound right??
  #4  
Old 03-08-2001, 08:17 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,061
What I think the lawyer is doing is giving half of the equity to the co-signer on paper to allow her to file bankruptcy and keep the home. The co-signer still has no claim to any equity unless that person is also investing in the equity. It is a legal way to shield property from the bankruptcy court. The federal government is a co-signer to about a quarter of all home mortgages in this country through FHA and VA lending programs but they do not have any equity in the homes unless the primary lender fails to maintain the payment schedule. Even then the equity reverts back to the lender, not the co-signer.
__________________
If you feel my answer is rude, mean, snarky or in anyway not to your liking, I did my job. You don't need to tell me.

No private messages, I do not reply to them.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.