Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Consumer Bankruptcy : Chapter 7, Chapter 13, Protection From Claims of Creditors
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Consumer Bankruptcy

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2004, 01:33 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52

using Corporate Credit card after filing ch7


What is the name of your state?tx
Can someone use her Corporate credit card after filing ch7? That card was not listed on the bk papers. If used will it have any affect on the case?
  #2  
Old 09-13-2004, 01:41 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 438

Maybe..


If the person has no interest in the corporation, there is no problem. Even if the person is part or sole owner of the corporation then if the credit card is strickly in the name of the corporation, and its a C Corp or LLC, and you've filed personal bankruptcy there should be no problem. If its a sole prop or if you've personally guaranteed the card, then there may be an issue.

Ask an attorney...
  #3  
Old 09-13-2004, 01:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,530
I agree. The relevant issues would be:
1) Was the bankruptcy personal or corporate??
2) What, if any, is the relationship between the bankruptcy and the corporate card?
3) Why was "That card was not listed on the bk papers" and should it have been?
4) What is the EXACT concern you have about using this card??
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #4  
Old 09-13-2004, 02:30 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52
Thanks for your responses. This card is through the company for travelling and food expenses. Bk filing is personal and the reason card was not listed was because it did not have any balances on it. The CONCERN I have is that this card is also from one of the CC companies that is listed on bk papers for a personal card account.
  #5  
Old 09-13-2004, 02:37 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,530
Okay, lets try this a different way.... if you have personal liability for this corporate-issued card, it should have been included in your creditor matrix, balance owed or not.

However, as long as the account is kept current, I doubt that there will be any repercussions from your using the card.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #6  
Old 09-13-2004, 02:56 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52
I did not include couple other cards on bk papers too becasuse they had 0 balances on them. My attorney had asked me that I didn't need to include those. Did I do it right?
  #7  
Old 09-13-2004, 03:09 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 438

Probably...


If you didn't owe them anything, there was no reason to include them. You might check your credit reports to see if they were closed by the CC company. If they weren't, you can use them. But remember, any new charges you would make on those cards you would now have to pay...you won't be able to discharge those.
  #8  
Old 09-14-2004, 09:46 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 57
You have a wise attorney. Mortgage Lender's want to see that debtor's have re-established credit and have learned to use it responsibly after a discharge. Most debtor's have to resort to obtaining secured credit cards, converting them to non-secured cards after making regular payments for a period of time. Also, Lender's want to see that the debtor has held the cards for a period of time, usually 24 months, and have made regular payments without any lates. You're ahead of the game already just by keeping the cards out of the bankruptcy. After the bankruptcy has been discharged, charge a small balance on the cards and pay the minimum payment regularly and on time and it'll be a major advantage to you when it's time to apply for a home loan.
__________________
Raymond
Bankruptcy Loan Officer
  #9  
Old 09-14-2004, 10:25 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52
thanks much. Got another question about reestablishing credit. My attorney asked me to reaffirm the car loan because it would help me to reestablish my credit. I am little hesitant to do that because what if down the road I am not able to make the payments? If I reaffirm will I not be held responsible for the loan? What are your thoughst on this issue? What is in the best interest of the debtor?
  #10  
Old 09-14-2004, 10:43 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 438

Yes


Yes, if you reaffirm, you will be held liable for the debt. If you find yourself unable to pay, and they reposess, you'll be required to pay the difference between what they sell it for and what you owe. Not good.

On the other, you should be able to continue making payments according to your monthly schedule. Usually, the banks/finance companies don't do anything as long as you're current. If you do find yourself unable to continue, call them and tell them to come get it and, since it was included in your BK, you're no longer liable.

The downside to this is I have heard of some folks having trouble getting the title to the car once its paid...not because of the BK, but because of the screwed up paper trail.

Also, (at least in our case), the bank continues to report to the CRA as "current, paid on time" so that it still has a positive affect on your CR.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.