S
Skyhawkcaw
Guest
What is the name of your state? Tennessee
When reviewing a contract for a new vehicle I purchased this past weekend, I noticed that among the options checked off on the contract was a box indicating the car had an automatic transmission. (There were similar boxes for power windows, steering etc.) This section of the contract had been printed out by computer.
Of course, the new car the contract refers to does not have an automatic transmission.
I've looked over the forums and saw the similar question recently answered re: 1997/8 model years. There the problem seemed rather minor. In this case though the presence of this option presumably defines the car in a way that the gelding/brood mare example does in the FAQ. (Don't mean to be pretentious--just wanted to let people know I looked around before asking.)
Thus is this mis-statement of the car in any sort of substantive way? Should the contract be reprinted and resigned?
Thanks.
When reviewing a contract for a new vehicle I purchased this past weekend, I noticed that among the options checked off on the contract was a box indicating the car had an automatic transmission. (There were similar boxes for power windows, steering etc.) This section of the contract had been printed out by computer.
Of course, the new car the contract refers to does not have an automatic transmission.
I've looked over the forums and saw the similar question recently answered re: 1997/8 model years. There the problem seemed rather minor. In this case though the presence of this option presumably defines the car in a way that the gelding/brood mare example does in the FAQ. (Don't mean to be pretentious--just wanted to let people know I looked around before asking.)
Thus is this mis-statement of the car in any sort of substantive way? Should the contract be reprinted and resigned?
Thanks.