Question about liability

[Mrmoomoo]

What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Nevada

I ride the transit system in town and my bike was stolen. But they don't allow you to lock the bike to the bus to prevent it from happening. Even though they have a sign saying they aren't responsible wouldn't the act of not allowing your bike to be locked up make them responsible?

 

[Ohiogal]

What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Nevada

I ride the transit system in town and my bike was stolen. But they don't allow you to lock the bike to the bus to prevent it from happening. Even though they have a sign saying they aren't responsible wouldn't the act of not allowing your bike to be locked up make them responsible?

Nope. You were put on notice that you couldn't lock your bike and you STILL CHOSE to ride the bus.

 

[tranquility]

What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Nevada

I ride the transit system in town and my bike was stolen. But they don't allow you to lock the bike to the bus to prevent it from happening. Even though they have a sign saying they aren't responsible wouldn't the act of not allowing your bike to be locked up make them responsible?

No. Not even close.

 

[Mrmoomoo]

Thanks all

 

[Mrmoomoo]

I have another question related, the rule that is listed isn't actually in the rules for riding the bus although some drivers are trying to enforce it. If I did comply and didn't lock it wouldn't that make the driver responsible for it as it isn't in the rules. Or would I still be responsible because I agreed to it. I assume the latter but I wanted to ask to be clear.

Thanks in advance

 

[tranquility]

The purpose for the sign is to make sure you are aware no bailment is created. They are not taking responsibility for your bike. Period. If they did some act that caused the damage or loss, that could be a problem. (Say, the bus crashed and hurt your bike.) But, they are not guaranteeing your choice to rack the bike against the illegal acts of others.