• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Veterinarian Malpractice or Abuse

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

dgengler

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Nebraska

(I apologize for the long story)

I am a resident of Omaha, NE. I took my miniature pinscher (birthday 3/17/2009) to a veterinarian clinic as of 7/14/2009 to have his ears cropped as of 7:30AM. The veterinarian had me sign a form stating that he cannot control prior health issues that may cause complications with anesthetic. I left the clinic and went to work. I called the clinic at 10:30 AM to check on the status of my puppy. At that time, the receptionist stated that the surgery went great and Doyle (my puppy) was awake and crying. I called again at 2:30 PM to check on Doyle's status again. For the second time, the receptionist stated that he was doing great and he was eating. When I got off work as of 5:00 PM, I went directly to the Veterinarian clinic to pick up my dog. However, Dr X stated that his temperature had dropped and they were trying to warm him up. I would be able to take him home in about a half an hour as of 5:20 PM. Doyle's condition as I arrived was very bad. His gums were nearly white, he could barely hold up his head, he was having a VERY hard time breathing as well as very cold to the touch. As I remained at the Vet's office, waiting on my puppy, his condition got worse as Dr X continued to fill Doyle with several different medicines. As of 7:30 PM, Doyle became completely unconscious as Dr X continued to give Doyle drugs and an I.V. The Vet continued to try to call other veterinarians for advise as he didn't know what else to do. As of 9:03 PM, Dr X advised me that Doyle was going to die and that I should put him down. As I was completely hysterical, I agreed as the Emergency Clinic advised, due to his current status, Doyle would not make it. As of 9:05 PM, my beloved miniature pinscher, Doyle, was put to sleep. Dr X stated that it was probably due to a health issue that was in his blood line. I paid the agreed bill of $319.00 as he did not charge me 50% of the total bill of the ears being cropped and the followup procedures to help Doyle recover, but led to his death instead. After obtaining Doyle's paper work, I contacted the breeder as well has their veterinarian. They both concluded that Doyle did not have any prior health issues and based upon his paper work that Dr X provided, Doyle was given an excess amount of anesthetic causing the medical issues and ultimately Doyle's death. At this point, I would like the bare minimum of the refund of my $319.00 although the replacement costs of my miniature pinscher would be another $900.00. Would I be entitled to this or do I not have any legal recourse to this situation? Please let me know as I don't feel it's right that I bring my dog in for a rather common procedure and end up with a dead dog and an additional $200 in vet bills for the veterinarian making the mistake. Thank you for your time and I appreciate your assistance in this matter.

Also, the Veterinarian stated that Doyle never fully woke up from the anesthetic and that Doyle's temperature had dropped as of 2:00PM. As the receptionist apparently had NO IDEA about my dog or was covering up the situation. I was never notified of the situation by the vet or his staff until I arrived. The vet stated he was worried Doyle was going to due as early as 2:00PM!

I excluded the Vet's name and clinic's name due to "possible slander" against his business. Although, from current research, I have found that he is currently involved in a malpractice law suit due to a similar situation. I'm not sure if this is relevant to my case, but enrages me that much more that a vet could get away with something like this.
 


xylene

Senior Member
Your dog had complications that were predictable and warned of.

You have no evidence of malpractice, or even of negligence.

You have no evidence of an overdose - your breeders assurances are a hunch at best.

The receptionists faulty information as to the dogs status is not material:

1: It had no bearing on the dogs treatment.
2: Even if the terminal prognosis had been know to you at 2, it would not improve your case.

You have no case.
 

dgengler

Junior Member
Even the additional costs over the surgery?

I faxed the documentation to my family's vet Friday, 7/17. He responded today, and he agreed that the dog was overdosed as well based upon the symptoms.

Can veterinarians just kill animals and have no responsibility as long as they tell the owner, "I may screw up."

If I tell you, "I may steal your car" would that justify me actually doing it? How is this legal?
 
Last edited:

quincy

Senior Member
Veterinary malpractice suits are often considered but rarely pursued because of the costs involved in bringing such an action and because of the fact that, even when won, the damages collectable tend to reflect state laws that regard animals as property.

If you believe that the veterinarian performed the surgery on your dog with gross incompetence or gross negligence, or that the surgery was performed with unlicensed assistants or technicians, and this led directly to the resulting complications and your puppy's death, you could file a complaint with the Nebraska Board of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, and they will investigate.

You could also consult with a Veterinary Malpractice attorney, who can review the veterinarian records on Doyle, and the current malpractice suit against the vet, and see if there is any action you have that would be worth pursuing. The veterinarian may, at the least, forgive the $319.00 - a lawsuit may allow you to recover the $900, with proof of incompetence or negligence.

Nebraska's laws on veterinarians and veterinary medicine are covered under Nebraska Revised Statutes Chapter 71, Article 1, Licenses, and Chapter 38, Article 33, Veterinary Medicine and Surgery Practices Act (see NRS §38-3301-3330, and §38-178 and §38-179 for Board Disciplinary Actions and disciplinary grounds).

I am really sorry for the loss of your dog.
 

quincy

Senior Member
Xylene, I have a dog that I adopted from the Humane Society and she came with a cropped tail. She scratches her tail area a lot, so I asked my vet about it. The vet said that a study was done on the declawing of cats, and researchers discovered that cats still try to use their "phantom claws" and seem to suffer from phantom pains when they are declawed. Phantom pain, in other words, seems to be every bit as real in animals as it is in humans.

Having a friend who is missing a limb and who suffers excruciating "phantom" pain in the area that no longer exists, I personally would never crop the tail or the ears of any pet. Until more studies are done and widely published, however, I think that people will continue to declaw cats, crop dog tails, and "pretty-up" the ears of miniature pinschers, not realizing the pain the animal can suffer as a result.

Oliver Sachs has written some books detailing case studies on phantom pain in humans. Interesting stuff.

I am again sorry for the loss of Doyle. The ear-cropping should generally not be fatal if done properly.
 
Last edited:

xylene

Senior Member
Especially when this common procedure is one of the most common procedures
Sadly for your dog, he died.

Of one of the most common problems - anesthesia complications

You were warned of the risk. Risk has a price - you were willing to pay it to have cropped ears. Doyle did not survive your gamble.
 

quincy

Senior Member
Hmmmm. Some (three?) posts have been deleted. Now it looks like I was talking to myself. . . . . . . . .


. . . . . . . .although, admittedly, when talking to myself I nicely avoid arguments.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top