Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Dangerous or Defective Products : Click here for useful articles and FAQs for the following drug and medical device hot topics - Fosamax, Seroquel, Trasylol, NuvaRing, Medtronic Sprint Fidelis leads, Stryker Howmedica Hip Implants, Shoulder Pain Pumps
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > ACCIDENT AND INJURY LAW > Dangerous or Defective Products

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2002, 08:23 PM
franniemae
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

chain of command???


state of LA. my mother-in-law, while a patient in hospital recovering from auto accident (concussion) went from being alert to totally unresponsive in a matter of minutes. two family members were present at the time and they notified her nurse immediately. she had no explanation and said she would notify my mother-in-law's Dr. immediately. after about 15 minutes, with no one checking on her, the nurse was again reminded. she said she called the dr., who was at his office 2 blocks away, and he would come as soon as possible. more time went by and still no dr. ..after about 15 more minutes the nurse was approached again. same story. eventually, approx. after 45 minutes the dr. did show up. he had no explanation for her turn for the worse nor did he have an explanation as to what took him so long to get there. my question is this. this appeared to be a situation that called for immediate intervention. why didn't the nurse summon a dr. that was already at the hospital? why didn't the primary dr. instruct the nurse to summon a dr. that was already at the hospital?
to shorten the story they finally determined she had a stroke.
my mother-in-law is slowly recovering. but has a long way to go. could the hospital, nurse, or dr. be held liable? how do we tell if their delayed response contributed to her present condition? this all happened 6 weeks ago. for the record my mother-in-law is 55 years old.
  #2  
Old 01-30-2002, 09:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: California
Posts: 1,154
Since she did not become comotose immediately following the accident it was not a sub-dural hematoma. I have to agree with the likelihood of a stroke. Evidently, a clot broke free and clogged a blood vessel. The event had occurred and there really is very little that could have been done that would have made much difference. Was she on any blood-thinners(Coumadin)?
Private doctors are very reluctant to interfere in the care of another doctor's patient. Given the litigous nature of patients and their relatives, they are fearful of suits should a "negative result" occur. They have enough worries with their own patients.
Perhaps her own doctor had another emergency that precluded him from an immediate response. You would have to ask him.
  #3  
Old 01-30-2002, 10:29 PM
franniemae
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
vrizm--i don't really know any more particulars about this, but i do appreciate your reply.
i guess it might just come down to the very sad litigous environment, just as you stated ,some professionals are exposed to day in and day out.
truly a sad commentary on a "civilized society."
thanks again..

Last edited by franniemae; 01-30-2002 at 10:40 PM.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.