Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Dangerous or Defective Products : Click here for useful articles and FAQs for the following drug and medical device hot topics - Fosamax, Seroquel, Trasylol, NuvaRing, Medtronic Sprint Fidelis leads, Stryker Howmedica Hip Implants, Shoulder Pain Pumps
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > ACCIDENT AND INJURY LAW > Dangerous or Defective Products

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2009, 01:28 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7

crest prohealth mouthwash/toothpaste


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? ny

proctor and gamble sent a letter stating that they admit there is a defect in their prohealth mouthwash & toothpaste products. a specific ingredient in the product causes the teeth to stain. as such, they ask me to sign a document stating that if they decide to pay for my dental cleaning based on future medical record examination and provide 2 free coupons for scope now, i will not sue. should my dentist feel the cleaning did not remove the stain, p&g "may" pay for a 2nd cleaning and if that doesn't work, then a teeth whitening. but it also says p&g reserves the right to not pay for the dental visit, x-rays, or cleaning altogether but i can keep those coupons. i didn't really read the entire thick package... just the last page

does it make any sense? or should i have a lawyer look through the thick packet? if so, what kind of lawyer should i seek? is it worth even talking to a lawyer?
  #2  
Old 08-25-2009, 01:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatsthis View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? ny

proctor and gamble sent a letter stating that they admit there is a defect in their prohealth mouthwash & toothpaste products. a specific ingredient in the product causes the teeth to stain. as such, they ask me to sign a document stating that if they decide to pay for my dental cleaning based on future medical record examination and provide 2 free coupons for scope now, i will not sue. should my dentist feel the cleaning did not remove the stain, p&g "may" pay for a 2nd cleaning and if that doesn't work, then a teeth whitening. but it also says p&g reserves the right to not pay for the dental visit, x-rays, or cleaning altogether but i can keep those coupons. i didn't really read the entire thick package... just the last page

does it make any sense? or should i have a lawyer look through the thick packet? if so, what kind of lawyer should i seek? is it worth even talking to a lawyer?
Is there anything wrong with your teeth?
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic!

Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to)
  #3  
Old 08-25-2009, 03:18 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1
I am guessing that if there are no signs of staining on your teeth, then you prob. don't have a lawsuit. Just my thoughts, though you would need to consult with your attorney, I am sure there are some out there that specialize in cases such as this.
  #4  
Old 08-25-2009, 04:33 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7

re:


there's definitely stains located on the sides of the teeth. i originally had my teeth whiten with zoom about 6 months ago. it was perfect. i then started using crest prohealth toothpaste and mouthwash for five months. my teeth had these "weird" stains that were not food stains. it was concluded that the stains were caused by the product. crest acknowledged that an ingredient inside their product caused the stain; however, their r&d team is working to rectify that problem based on the number of people affected by it. there hasn't been any research regarding the long term effect of that ingredient. the american dental association refuses to recognize or approve the product. there's currently a lawsuit pending in chicago against p&g regarding this as well. but p&g decided to issue a package to customers indicating they may pay for teeth cleaning should i decide not to pursue any legal avenues. so my question would be... if i don't know the long term effects of the ingredient, should i still sign that last page stating i agree to the dental cleaning and 2 free coupons in return to not sue? thanks!
  #5  
Old 08-25-2009, 04:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,793
There isn't going to be much money in a lawsuit for something as minor as this. Have you seen a dentist about the stains? Does he/she think they can be removed with a cleaning or whitening?
__________________
Lawsuits are not about justice. They are about MONEY. If you don't want money, then you shouldn't be thinking about suing. And people post here because they are thinking about suing. Because they want money, no matter how much they don't want to admit that to themselves.

-Auto insurance adjuster for 2 years - as of 6/15/09, I am FREE!
  #6  
Old 08-26-2009, 02:14 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7

re:


the dentist said my insurance won't cover another cleaning as i just had one a few months ago. but he's not sure as he doesn't have experience with that ingredient in crest prohealth. as of my knowledge, there is a lawsuit filed against p&g right now by a lawyer in chicago. he is claiming that the product caused him the same problem. what should i do? sign that agreement in hopes they'll pay for a cleaning?
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.