| medical malpractice If a patient signs a consent to have a central line put in and the person putting in the line punctures their lung while doing so not just once but twice and it prolonged their hospital stay to over two weeks, do they have a case? I can understand the risks laid out in the consent but for the person to puncture the lung and knowing that they did, they should never have tried the second time. This caused many problems, lots of pain and lost time.
Any input would be appreciated.
This is the state of Florida |