Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Debt Collections

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2006, 10:37 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2

Bank account garnished-Michigan


Yesterday my son-in-law tried to use his debit card and it was refused. Turns out there was a garnishment on his joint checking account with his wife, my daughter. There was no notice of this garnishment from anyone.

Today we discovered that the garnishment was done by a collection attorney's office that my daughter has been making regular payments to. She had an agreement to make a monthly payment against the debt for a year and then they were supposed to negotiate again. The year is far from up.

Son-in-law feels garnisment is illegal because most of the funds were from his pay and the debt was his wife's before they were married.

Daughter feels betrayed because she has been making regular payments per the agreement.

Can anyone advise them on what to do next? Fees are mounting at the bank and their wages, plus my daughter's children's social security pay will be direct deposited this coming week. They will have utilities turned off and all sorts of problems if they cannot find a way to stop this.
  #2  
Old 02-03-2006, 04:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,270
Well first of all, there is no way this was done without any prior notice, they had to be sued in court (unless it was a state or federal debt) and they had to be served a summons in some manner. By not going to the court hearing, which I am assuming they didn't, a default judgment was entered against them.

It is possible the the whole reason she called the collection attorney was because she received notice of a pending suit on the debt and wished to make some sort of arrangements to avoid that.

It would not be the first time an attorney accepted a payment offer, told someone not to worry about the court date since they had settled the matter and then went through with the court date anyway. If this is what happened, there isn't much recourse because collections people just want their money, it was her responsiblity to either verify the court date was cancelled or to be there and make the judge aware of the recent agreement made.

As to the bank account garnishment, the bank had to see a judges order (like I said unless it was a state or federal debt) to let them do this. The bank has no choice in this case once they are presented with the court order.

Their taking the money is not illegal, no matter whose it was, her husband can however file to get his portion of the money back as well as the children's SS payments by presenting the CA with proof that he has no connection to this debt and that percentage of the money in their was his and the children's SS (SS funds cannot be seized or garnished unless it is a state or federal debt either!)

Their best bet right now is to stop those direct deposit ASAP! It is going to take awhile to sort out and get back the portion of the money that they can get returned to them. Once the CA gets their hands on it, they are very reluctant to ever give it up again.
__________________
Please remember that the search feature on this site, Google, and websters.com are all your friends!!!
  #3  
Old 02-03-2006, 06:37 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville,TN
Posts: 15,706
Quote:
There was no notice of this garnishment from anyone.
Why would there be ?? They have a judgment against your daughter. If they told people they were going to sieze bank accounts people would move the money -- they do not HAVE to notify the judgment debtor of a bank levy.
Quote:
She had an agreement to make a monthly payment against the debt for a year and then they were supposed to negotiate again. The year is far from up.
Was the agreement in WRITING ?? If not, there essentially is no 'agreement'. If the payments she's making are too small to get the debt paid off in a reasonable amount of time, then they will NOT wait years to get paid.

Quote:
Son-in-law feels garnisment is illegal because most of the funds were from his pay and the debt was his wife's before they were married.
Its NOT illegal, her name is on the account that is ALL the judgment creditor or the bank cares about. Your son-in-law/daughter needs to immediately appeal the levy with the court and show PROOF what funds were his and why.
Quote:
Daughter feels betrayed because she has been making regular payments per the agreement.
Again, if it wasn't in writing, it never existed.

Quote:
Can anyone advise them on what to do next? Fees are mounting at the bank and their wages, plus my daughter's children's social security pay will be direct deposited this coming week. They will have utilities turned off and all sorts of problems if they cannot find a way to stop this.
APPEAL the levy first thing Monday morning by going to the courthouse and asking the court clerk for the forms needed to do so. OR get a lawyer ASAP. They must ALSO file the EXEMPTIONS to protect that social security money.
__________________
"Knowledge is Power - use it as you see fit !

I am not a lawyer or a member of the legal profession. My advice is based on research and experience, my own and others, some who practice law. You decide for yourself what actions you do or do not take from my advice.
  #4  
Old 02-03-2006, 11:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,807
Yes, file the exemptions and remember that two people on a bank account -- it doesn't matter which one of them puts the money in. Nor unfortanetly for you does it matter if some of that money was SSI. Once you deposited the money in the account and co-mingled it with other funds -- you lose that objection.

Yes, I know. Someone is going to ask for the source of that statement. Hopefully someone will step up and help me out with the source, as I in Florida and leaving the country in the morning -- I'm not going to research it. This net connection is costing me a $1 a minute.

DC

PS -- Back in 2 weeks or so
__________________
Three books every person should read cover to cover at least once: The Richest Man in Babylon, The Complete Works of Shakespeare and the King James Bible. -- If you can't learn how to live a happy successful life from those books, you are beyond hope.

Quote:
OP needs counseling...not a court house. --Zigner
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.