![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Collector Contacted My NeighborWhat is the name of your state? Oregon Today my neighbor was contacted by Ken from ASI wanting to know information about me. Is this ok to do? Now my neighbor knows I have a debt owed through this company. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| It is legal to call people who live nearby your address and ask if they know how to reach you. As with all third parties though, a third party CA cannot disclose that you have a debt or that you are in collections. The usual script for calling nearbys is as follows... Ring, Ring Neighbor: Hello? Collector: Hi, Bob? N: Yeah, who's this? C: This is Jim, hey, I hate to bug you, but I'm trying to get ahold of Sam, your neighbor across the street, and I haven't been able to. You wouldn't happen to know how to reach him, would you? N: No, not really. I could take a note over to him, though. What's your number? C: Really? That'd be great! My number is 800-555-1212. Just tell him to call Jim. N: Ok. C: Thanks again! Easy as pie. Sometimes, a third party will get nosy, and as a collector you just have to start thinking fast on the phone. So long as we don't lie and don't disclose the debt, we're within our rights as collectors to do some research on a hard to reach or running debtor. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| draygnmage - Good to see you. I thought you might have gotten disgusted with all the flack in the air and left. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Nah, midmonth is looming, so I had to go beat some money out of debtors to make my mid month goal. ![]() |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| I smell some cash here, like $1,000...Can you spell VIOLATION. I would get started right on it and let them know that. This just might scare them off. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| This isn't a violation.
__________________ My new signature: Originally Posted by arazi Quote:
|
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Civil Action No. CV-990-7874 FTC File No. 982 3130 ETA: It's a FDCPA violation to: communicate with third parties for purposes other than acquiring location information about consumers, without consumers' consent even insinuating debt will be a violation Perimeter Credit, L.L.C. and Account Portfolios, Inc., U.S. v. (Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division), File No. 952 3142
__________________ You purchased nothing from me and I never lent you money but you owe me Purchasers and collectors of debts are considerable less than amoebas NEVER SPEAK WITH BILL COLLECTORS ON THE PHONE. THEY RECORD ALL THEIR PHONE CALLS Last edited by skidmarks; 08-14-2007 at 02:06 PM. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| May a debt collector contact anyone else about your debt? If you have an attorney, the debt collector must contact the attorney, rather than you. If you do not have an attorney, a collector may contact other people, but only to find out where you live, what your phone number is, and where you work. Collectors usually are prohibited from contacting such third parties more than once. In most cases, the collector may not tell anyone other than you and your attorney that you owe money. Op didn't say that the collector TOLD the neighbor about the debt. OP only says that now the neighbor "knows" about it.
__________________ My new signature: Originally Posted by arazi Quote:
|
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| And if the 3rd party specifically asks for the company, we are required to give the name of the company. But that in and of itself does not constitute a 3rd party disclosure. If the neighbor knows you well enough to draw their conclusions ... that's neither our fault nor our problem. DC
__________________ Three books every person should read cover to cover at least once: The Richest Man in Babylon, The Complete Works of Shakespeare and the King James Bible. -- If you can't learn how to live a happy successful life from those books, you are beyond hope. Quote:
|
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Hey, skid, good job on copying the relevent portion, but bolding what you felt like. I'll type slowly in deference to skid: When... we... call... neighbors... it... is... to... get... location... information. Now go read your little quote again and this time read the *right* part. Like this. It's a FDCPA violation to: communicate with third parties for purposes other than acquiring location information about consumers, without consumers' consent even insinuating debt will be a violation. Last edited by draygnmage; 08-15-2007 at 05:16 PM. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| The ken lynch pin issue is: Has ASI established debtor contact with dare1969 at that location? If so, it might seem that calling his neighbors is a potential violation.
__________________ I've often thought of becoming a golf club. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ "Knowledge is Power - use it as you see fit ! I am not a lawyer or a member of the legal profession. My advice is based on research and experience, my own and others, some who practice law. You decide for yourself what actions you do or do not take from my advice. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| ASI has established debtor contact w/ me at this location, and the phone call to my neighbor stated "Hi, this is Ken from ASI. I see that you are a neighbor of ***** do you know if he is there." |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Per the FTC Staff Commentary on the FDCPA, contacting a neighbor when they already HAVE valid contact info would be a violation of the Act : Quote:
Quote:
The 'do you know if he is there' does NOT conform to the definition in 1692b of 'location information' .. clearly they KNOW where you live and simply not answering your phone does not give them grounds to say they're 'acquiring location information'.
__________________ "Knowledge is Power - use it as you see fit ! I am not a lawyer or a member of the legal profession. My advice is based on research and experience, my own and others, some who practice law. You decide for yourself what actions you do or do not take from my advice. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Actually, not answering the phone when he previously talked to the collectors *does* give them a valid reason to believe that he may have moved, hence asking the neighbor "is he still there?" The collector was attempting to verify the location of the debtor and did so without disclosing information. (Otherwise the OP would have jumped all over that instead of "they knew I lived there.") |
![]() |