 | | 
06-24-2009, 01:52 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
| | confused!!! Arizona/ I have a situation my car was repode back in 2003. I owed $1200-$1500, now they are trying to garnish my waiges. I called and asked if they would let me make atleast $100 monthly payments. The lady yelled at me and sai NOWAY I WILL SEE YOU IN COURT! What can I do? She wants me to pay $500 a month!!! I cannot afford that at all...please help!!! | 
06-24-2009, 08:50 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,336
| | | They are under no obligation to accept partial payment or to have a payment plan that you decide how much you can pay. The mere fact that you are in this situation shows that you failed to pay as agreed twice - once when you defaulted and got your car repoed and once when you did not pay the deficiency balance.
It sounds like they plan to sue you and get a judgment for the deficiency balance, plus interest and fees. This could be much greater than the original $1200.
I am not sure what defense you would have in a lawsuit oter than a possibility that the debt is too old - the statute of limitations in AZ in 6 years for contracts. If they do sue you then you need to look carefully at the dates of the suit and of your original default. | 
06-24-2009, 10:04 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Deep East Texas
Posts: 1,219
| | | It appears she already has a judgment against her since they are trying to garnish her wages.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by dolly09 Apparently others (those who have obviously received no further education than a diploma or more likely a G.E.D) quitting a sorority does not implicate you have quit college. ....I am receiving my masters in Communication in two weeks.
Private message from dolly a few days later: "when did communications have anything to do with grammar and puncutation." | | 
06-24-2009, 10:16 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,336
| | | Yes, they may have a judgment against her due to the garnishing comment, but they may not due to the "NOWAY I WILL SEE YOU IN COURT!" comment.
But, if they readlly had a judgment, then why are they discussing garnishment with her instead of just doing it?
cocoflores: Were you already sued over this debt? | 
06-24-2009, 10:39 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Deep East Texas
Posts: 1,219
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by cocoflores Arizona/ I have a situation my car was repode back in 2003. I owed $1200-$1500, now they are trying to garnish my waiges. I called and asked if they would let me make atleast $100 monthly payments. The lady yelled at me and sai NOWAY I WILL SEE YOU IN COURT! What can I do? She wants me to pay $500 a month!!! I cannot afford that at all...please help!!! | I took the bolded statement to mean she already had a judgment. It was good of you to specifically ask her the question. Now we wait for the answer.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by dolly09 Apparently others (those who have obviously received no further education than a diploma or more likely a G.E.D) quitting a sorority does not implicate you have quit college. ....I am receiving my masters in Communication in two weeks.
Private message from dolly a few days later: "when did communications have anything to do with grammar and puncutation." | | 
06-24-2009, 12:07 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,310
| | | Because a collector would NEVER threaten to garnish wages before having an actual judgement in place....
__________________ Lawsuits are not about justice. They are about MONEY. If you don't want money, then you shouldn't be thinking about suing. And people post here because they are thinking about suing. Because they want money, no matter how much they don't want to admit that to themselves.
-Auto insurance adjuster for 2 years - as of 6/15/09, I am FREE!
| 
06-24-2009, 08:42 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 662
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ecmst12 Because a collector would NEVER threaten to garnish wages before having an actual judgement in place.... | Because a LEGITIMATE collector would NEVER threaten to garnish wages before having an actual judgment in place....
There, fixed it for you. | 
06-24-2009, 09:02 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,773
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by cosine Because a LEGITIMATE collector would NEVER threaten to garnish wages before having an actual judgment in place....
There, fixed it for you. | But they might lead you in to making that statement for them. Lord knows I have often enough.
"One last thing, do you have attorney information you would like to provide at this time?"
Debtor- Why would you need my attorney information?
Why do you think we need your attorney info?
To sue me and garnish my wages
Is that what you want to happen?
No.
Ok, now read me the first set of numbers on the bottom of your check starting from the left...
DC
__________________
Three books every person should read cover to cover at least once: The Richest Man in Babylon, The Complete Works of Shakespeare and the King James Bible. -- If you can't learn how to live a happy successful life from those books, you are beyond hope. Quote: |
OP needs counseling...not a court house. --Zigner | | 
06-24-2009, 09:07 PM
| | Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 662
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by debtcollector` But they might lead you in to making that statement for them. Lord knows I have often enough.
"One last thing, do you have attorney information you would like to provide at this time?"
Debtor- Why would you need my attorney information?
Why do you think we need your attorney info?
To sue me and garnish my wages
Is that what you want to happen?
No.
Ok, now read me the first set of numbers on the bottom of your check starting from the left...
DC | Sounds legitimate to me. Of course my standard advice is to provide no information whatsoever over the telephone ... not attorney info ... not check info ... not CC info ... certainly not an SSN. | 
06-25-2009, 12:30 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
| | | ans Quote:
Originally Posted by Some Random Guy They are under no obligation to accept partial payment or to have a payment plan that you decide how much you can pay. The mere fact that you are in this situation shows that you failed to pay as agreed twice - once when you defaulted and got your car repoed and once when you did not pay the deficiency balance.
It sounds like they plan to sue you and get a judgment for the deficiency balance, plus interest and fees. This could be much greater than the original $1200.
I am not sure what defense you would have in a lawsuit oter than a possibility that the debt is too old - the statute of limitations in AZ in 6 years for contracts. If they do sue you then you need to look carefully at the dates of the suit and of your original default. |
I got a paper sent to my job and my job sent it to me stating I was going to get garnished $50 biweekly. Then that is when I called that lady and she said she would see me in court I don't understand what was going on? But I am willing to pay them $50 biweekly. I dont know what to do? who I need to go to? She wants me to pay $500 a month!! ughh | 
06-25-2009, 12:32 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Some Random Guy Yes, they may have a judgment against her due to the garnishing comment, but they may not due to the "NOWAY I WILL SEE YOU IN COURT!" comment.
But, if they readlly had a judgment, then why are they discussing garnishment with her instead of just doing it?
cocoflores: Were you already sued over this debt? |
no I havent been sued Im guessing that is what they are looking for?? | 
06-25-2009, 12:42 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 662
| | | What was on this paper your employer got? Does it identify a judgment and what court issued that judgment? If not, be sure to inform your employer that it is fraudulent and that you will hold them legally accountable if there isn't a legitimate garnishment order from a court. | 
06-25-2009, 02:07 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Some Random Guy Yes, they may have a judgment against her due to the garnishing comment, but they may not due to the "NOWAY I WILL SEE YOU IN COURT!" comment.
But, if they readlly had a judgment, then why are they discussing garnishment with her instead of just doing it?
cocoflores: Were you already sued over this debt? | yea it is weird.... | 
06-25-2009, 02:10 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by cosine What was on this paper your employer got? Does it identify a judgment and what court issued that judgment? If not, be sure to inform your employer that it is fraudulent and that you will hold them legally accountable if there isn't a legitimate garnishment order from a court. | it says answer to garnishee earnings-continuing lien
then they have my sons name on it as husband and wife??
it also has a paper request for hearing | 
06-25-2009, 05:28 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Deep East Texas
Posts: 1,219
| | | Get the paper and tell us exactly what it says (leave out all identifying information such as names, addresses, etc.).
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by dolly09 Apparently others (those who have obviously received no further education than a diploma or more likely a G.E.D) quitting a sorority does not implicate you have quit college. ....I am receiving my masters in Communication in two weeks.
Private message from dolly a few days later: "when did communications have anything to do with grammar and puncutation." | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.