Well Iím back again on the same case
This case has been dismissed twice and brought back.
The first time it was dismissed due to the fact that they moved for default judgment because I had not responded.
Which in fact I had and then had to prove that I had they did not show so it was dismissed.
The this last time They showed and wanted to dispute my claim of SOL saying it was a written contract. But she had not done something that pissed off the judge and she asked the lawyer why she hadnít done it and said that I had asserted a solid defense.
But then turned to me and asked why i had not responded to the latest letter they had sent me to prove my case.
(Me.) Your honer I was not aware that I needed to reply as it did not state that I needed to like the last one did.
(judge.) Well thatís not my problem I can not teach you to be a lawyer and if you chose to defend your self then you need to start learning and thatís what you get for defending your self.
So I was then instructed that the case was dismissed but I need to respond to the new letter that I would be receiving and that I need to prove my case.
Iím just confused I had all the stuff I needed to try and prove my case with me but she wouldnít hear me. Whats the point of going to court if its not to prove your case. ugggg Iím so frustrated.
So I am in need of some Kentucky case law if anyone knows of any.
I could really use some help Thanks for listing to me rage and Thanks for any help
And to Zigner I apologize for not responding I did not receive a email or somehow over looked it.
To answer your question yes I did live here in 2004.