![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Mini-Miranda statementWhat is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? AZ On the 18th I posted this thread and got no replies...with the weath of knowledge here I'm surprised...so I thought I'd try again.... On several web sites on the allowable acts of collections agencies when they call you on the phone, I have seen the following statement posted as being mandatory: "Hello, I am _________(name of collector). I am (or this office is) a debt collector representing____________(creditor). Information obtained during the course of this call will be used for the purpose of collecting the debt." How much of this statement must the debt collector say and when? If he/she fails to give this statement is that failure actionabile in court as a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ? Where in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is this "mini_miranda" statement found? Edit/Delete Message ![]() |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| If it is their first contact with you, by phone, then they are required to state the mini-miranda. Same goes for 1st communication letters. The 'mini miranda' IS in the FDCPA more or less. The wording can vary as long as the follow the law. The rest is pretty much established by case law. Quote:
__________________ "Knowledge is Power - use it as you see fit ! I am not a lawyer or a member of the legal profession. My advice is based on research and experience, my own and others, some who practice law. You decide for yourself what actions you do or do not take from my advice. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
The '3rd party debt collector' MUST make certain statements during their intial contact (verbal or written) and other information is not required until any subsequent contact (or followup). The 'mini-Miranda' (as some have called it), falls under the following FDCPA: § 807. False or misleading representations [15 USC 1692e] A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section: <snip> (11) The failure to disclose in the initial written communication with the consumer and, in addition, if the initial communication with the consumer is oral, in that initial oral communication, that the debt collector is attempting to collect a debt and that any information obtained will be used for that purpose, and the failure to disclose in subsequent communications that the communication is from a debt collector, except that this paragraph shall not apply to a formal pleading made in connection with a legal action. For more: [url]http://www.lawdog.com/debtcol/dc05p.htm[/url]
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution). Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! |
![]() |