Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Debt Collections

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2005, 03:50 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1

Need advice on bank garnishment for ex's judgement


Oklahoma

I have been divorced for about a year. Recently, my ex-husband was served a money judgement from a lawyer representing a credit card. Please note that it was not my credit card, and the judgement did not include me, nor did I have any knowledge of this judgement. While we were married, we had maintained seperate bank accounts, but each of us was listed on the other's account as a benefactor in the event one of us died so that the other would be able to provide for our daughter. We never used each others account, did not even have our names on the other's checks, and had no bank card to the other's account. After our divorce, my bank would not allow me to remove his name, and I really wasn't concerned because he had never accessed my account. Last Friday the full amount of what I had in my checking account (I had just deposited my payroll check) was frozen and eventually garnished due to the money judgement on my ex-husband that I had no knowledge of. My five year old daughter receives money every month from Social Security that is also deposited into this account, and was also part of the money that was garnished. I pulled my deposit records for the last 90 days and was able to prove that every penny that went into that account was either my payroll or my daughter's social security. I also faxed the attorney a copy of my divorce decree that shows that any asset I have obtained since the date of my seperation from my ex is mine and only mine. The opposing attorney will not release the garnishment, even though I have proven that the money was mine and my daughter's, and that my ex and I have not been "co-mingling" funds. If this thing goes to court, is my money and my daughter's money exempt from a garnishment that does not include either one of us? Any advise is appreciated.
  #2  
Old 12-23-2005, 05:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 40,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by singlemom721
Last Friday the full amount of what I had in my checking account (I had just deposited my payroll check) was frozen and eventually garnished due to the money judgement on my ex-husband that I had no knowledge of.
There is no requirement that you have knowledge of the judgment. The simple fact that the account is CO-owned (both names on it) is sufficient to warrant the garnishment.

Quote:
My five year old daughter receives money every month from Social Security that is also deposited into this account, and was also part of the money that was garnished.
File an exemption motion with the court, present your evidence of the SS deposits and the court should release THOSE funds.

Quote:
I pulled my deposit records for the last 90 days and was able to prove that every penny that went into that account was either my payroll or my daughter's social security.
Your payroll is not relevant... it is not exempt from seizure.

[qutoe]I also faxed the attorney a copy of my divorce decree that shows that any asset I have obtained since the date of my seperation from my ex is mine and only mine.[/quote]
Not relevant. His name is on the account... it is his jointly owned money.

[quote If this thing goes to court, is my money and my daughter's money exempt from a garnishment that does not include either one of us?[/quote]
As noted above, the SS funds are exempted, but your money is not. You will need to pursue a separate lawsuit against your ex to try to recover your 'damages' (amount you were forced to pay on HIS debt).
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) filed in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.7M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.