Wake up and smell coffee, tea, or juice.
K'Ta said:
Keep talking. I'm sure you'll eventually convince yourself you're right and JETX, a lawyer, is wrong.
Let us know how that works for you in court when you get sued.
1) I do not need your permission to
talk or write, as only in your sweetest dreams, SuiJuris is under your control and authority.
2) You are
"sure..."
In order to be sure, one must posses sound logic, which is a pre-requisite to the former.
In your case, based on your reply, you proved that
you may not be "sure!"
3) You may not speak on my behalf what I try to
convince myself or not, as, only I know that, unless
you run psychic connection through mother Cleo
or one of your fellows.
4) Your statement, which yields a conclusion that
only lawyers are right and non-lawyers are wrong is based on fallacy and absurdness.
That is self evident!
That is called - being "educated out of common sense!"
Logical proof to 4)
When two opposing lawyers litigate a case in Court, obviously one of them looses.
Therefore, the conclusion is that, at any given time,
50% of lawyers loose.
Furthermore, with time, even the wining party may loose another case.
That means that, from time to time,
most lawyers loose a case and are considered to be "wrong" in that regard.
Next:
5) Fact: Judges are lawyers.
Most judges loose appeals from time to time.
That proves, them being "wrong."
Based on the above facts a statement of yours, by the
reversed negation that a non-layer is wrong and a lawyer is right is a fallacy and absurdness that a child can see but you failed to grasp.
So much for you logical abilities and coherence.
Next:
6) Throughout the history, most of the impact and discoveries - scientific and artistic work, and largely social results has been done
by People comprising their societies - yes, real People.
L
awyers' and judges' input concerning the above has been, overall, no more
than 1-2%!
That is
reality of life and not your wishful thinking.
Jesus Christ, Buddha, Mohamed, Einstein, Mozart, Tchaikovsky, Homer, Hermes Trismegistus, Tesla,
and millions of others, etc. were ALL non-lawyers - period!
98-99% were the People for the People - not l-a-w-y-e-r-s.
Argue with that if like - good luck!
7) Do you work or have worked for a debt collector attorney?
What you stated in your profile is so expressive of you:
Location:
Outside your window looking in
Furthermore, via my post: Court cases and laws quoted remained
unrebutted by you, so your opposition has defaulted by substance.
So much for your lagniappes of wisdom, law, and reality of life!
You, just publicly embarrassed yourself before the Consumers who read the post.
Some lawyers may applaud you - decent ones... I doubt.
I must, also, mention that
rudeness, and lack of basic manners coming through your wise post is
self-evident.There was nothing besides spite and desire to ridicule any non-lawyer.
I can state that you have engaged the wrong party to spread your toxins on.
Guess what?
I stood up to you and those you represent who may believe in the same arrogance.
In the process, I believe, it has been done based on truth, logic, and history.
Real people would
discern for themselves.
As for "unreal" ones - they have their path in life and equal rights.
I thank you for exposing the essence of your kind, as people need to
experience both sides under the Free Will.
Amen!
SuiJuris