Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > BANKRUPTCY AND CONSUMER CREDIT > Debt Collections

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2008, 06:06 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 11

A question about Wage Garnishment for Student Loans


What is the name of your state? Wisconsin


Recently, the department of Education started garnishing my wife's paychecks, for 15% for student loans.

My question, is what is considered "disposable income"? According to my wife's employer, it's 15% of what's left after taxes are taken out. Everything we've read online(including the Employer's Handbook from the Department of Education) say disposable income is what's left after taxes, AND health insurance premiums.

It makes a big difference to us, as $600 is taken out of every paycheck for health insurance. So who is correct?
  #2  
Old 01-02-2008, 07:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by wisone View Post
My question, is what is considered "disposable income"?
From: Wisconsin "Employers’ Guide to Income Withholding" and though it is specifically for child and medical supports, the same rules apply to judgment garnishment.

Disposable income is the employee’s earnings remaining after federal, state and local withholding taxes and Social Security taxes are deducted. Deductions for Individual
Retirement Accounts (IRAs), medical expense accounts, etc. do not reduce disposable
income.

[url]http://www.dwd.state.wi.us/dwd/publications/dws/child_support/pdf/dwsc_11742_p.pdf[/url]

Click here for a copy of the form you can file with the court to try to challenge the garnishment:
[url]http://www.wicourts.gov/formdisplay/CV-424.pdf?formNumber=CV-424&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en[/url]
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #3  
Old 01-02-2008, 10:21 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 11
That's what I originally thought, but according to the Department of Educations website, federal law supersedes state law. [url]http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSFAP/DCS/Employers_Handbook.pdf[/url]

The federal law defines 'disposable income' as this:

"For purposes of Wage Garnishment Order, “disposable pay” means the employee’s compensation (including, but not limited to, salary, overtime, bonuses, commissions, sick leave and vacation pay) from an employer after the deduction of health insurance premiums and any amounts required by law to be withheld. Proper deductions include Federal, State, and Local taxes, State unemployment and disability taxes, social security taxes, and involuntary pension contributions, but do not include voluntary pension or retirement plan contributions, union dues, or amounts withheld pursuant to a court order, and the like."

So I guess i'm wondering, what parts of the federal law supersede state law? All of it, or just certain parts? It appears that her employer is using the state's definition, and not the federal?

Also, will filing that form to challenge the garnishment even apply? There was no court date, or judgement. According to some federal law, the dept of ED doesn't need one to garnish for student loans.
  #4  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:41 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
AWG or Administrative Wage Garnishment is authorized by congress and the rules are the same in all states. Has your wife talked to her employer with the page from the employer handbook that indicates that health insurance should be taken into account? If they refuse, contact the Department of Education for help.
  #5  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:04 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 11
We've talked to ECMC, and they stopped the garnishment, and got her on a rehabilitation plan, so everything's good.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.