Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Divorce, Separation & Annulment

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2005, 01:36 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 8
Question

Advantage of Vehicle Tracking Information in a Divorce


What is the name of your state? Michigan

Since I did not get a definitive answer to my last posting of this subject, please bear with me when I ask it again. Thank you.

I am considering the purchase and use of a vehicle tracker. I'd like to track my husband's vehicle without his knowledge because I suspect that he is cheating on me. We have no children and we each own our own vehicle (no joint ownership). I am trying to determine if the money to buy it would be better spent some other way such as possible future divorce expenses.
Would I gain any legal advantages in proving he is cheating on me with the information the tracking would provide, or merely personal validation? The information would show vehicle locations, their frequency and duration. This information would narrow the locations of surveillance and provide backup for my allegations, especially in confronting him. A vehicle tracker is much cheaper than a private investigator. I am aware that it can also help show that he is not cheating on me. A relative of mine recently went through a divorce in Michigan, a No-Fault divorce state, and her proving of adultery provided her advantages in the issues of division of property, division of debt and alimony. I do not want alimony, but I'm afraid he might try to get it because he is self-employed, unlike me, and there is no way to prove the fact that he makes more income than I do.

Thank you, again, for your responses.

Last edited by innocentspouse; 09-23-2005 at 01:37 PM. Reason: Typo
  #2  
Old 09-23-2005, 01:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 41,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by innocentspouse
What is the name of your state? Michigan

Since I did not get a definitive answer to my last posting of this subject, please bear with me when I ask it again. Thank you.

I am considering the purchase and use of a vehicle tracker. I'd like to track my husband's vehicle without his knowledge because I suspect that he is cheating on me. We have no children and we each own our own vehicle (no joint ownership). I am trying to determine if the money to buy it would be better spent some other way such as possible future divorce expenses.
Would I gain any legal advantages in proving he is cheating on me with the information the tracking would provide, or merely personal validation? The information would show vehicle locations, their frequency and duration. This information would narrow the locations of surveillance and provide backup for my allegations, especially in confronting him. A vehicle tracker is much cheaper than a private investigator. I am aware that it can also help show that he is not cheating on me. A relative of mine recently went through a divorce in Michigan, a No-Fault divorce state, and her proving of adultery provided her advantages in the issues of division of property, division of debt and alimony. I do not want alimony, but I'm afraid he might try to get it because he is self-employed, unlike me, and there is no way to prove the fact that he makes more income than I do.

Thank you, again, for your responses.
You would not gain any legal advantage. It would be personal validation only.
Your money is best spent elsewhere.

Unless you are wealthy and would be facing paying serious alimony. Then there is some slight change it might help you.
  #3  
Old 09-23-2005, 02:03 PM
jackedbyjudge
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

persistant about this aren't you?


Quote:
Originally Posted by innocentspouse
What is the name of your state? Michigan

Since I did not get a definitive answer to my last posting of this subject, please bear with me when I ask it again. Thank you.

I am considering the purchase and use of a vehicle tracker. I'd like to track my husband's vehicle without his knowledge because I suspect that he is cheating on me. We have no children and we each own our own vehicle (no joint ownership). I am trying to determine if the money to buy it would be better spent some other way such as possible future divorce expenses.
Would I gain any legal advantages in proving he is cheating on me with the information the tracking would provide, or merely personal validation? The information would show vehicle locations, their frequency and duration. This information would narrow the locations of surveillance and provide backup for my allegations, especially in confronting him. A vehicle tracker is much cheaper than a private investigator. I am aware that it can also help show that he is not cheating on me. A relative of mine recently went through a divorce in Michigan, a No-Fault divorce state, and her proving of adultery provided her advantages in the issues of division of property, division of debt and alimony. I do not want alimony, but I'm afraid he might try to get it because he is self-employed, unlike me, and there is no way to prove the fact that he makes more income than I do.

Thank you, again, for your responses.

you didn't like my suggestion? you don't want to see your name up in lights like susan lucci??

my guess is that your own personal (and biased) detective work won't stand a snowballs chance in h*ll getting before a judge....using a professional in the field "might" if the judge even cares to hear about it
  #4  
Old 09-26-2005, 06:58 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 8

Thank You


Thank you LdiJ. I wonder why my relative got legal advantages proving adultery with her divorce, then; but thank you.
  #5  
Old 09-26-2005, 07:23 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 41,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by innocentspouse
Thank you LdiJ. I wonder why my relative got legal advantages proving adultery with her divorce, then; but thank you.
I can't answer that question. It may have been a psycological advantage rather than a legal one. Maybe guilt caused her ex to be more generous in his agreements.
  #6  
Old 09-26-2005, 03:28 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 8

Ex Was Not Generous


Thank you again for your additional response. I'll just add that the ex was not generous; in fact, he didn't want to give her anything, but the judge gave her more than the alimony she had requested because she had proof of his adultery that he kept denying. She had written proof and the woman he cheated with testified for her against her ex. I guess I'll just consider it a big question mark. Thanks anyway.

Last edited by innocentspouse; 09-26-2005 at 03:30 PM.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.