Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Divorce, Separation & Annulment

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-07-2005, 06:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1

Advice related Divorce


What is the name of your state? Texas

My wife filed a petition for dissolution of marriage with the Californa Suprior court. We are married since 88 and lived in Texas and other states. Never lived in California as a couple.

We are physically separated for the last 7 years. She moved to California and I was helping her financially all this time.

We don't have childrens or community propert (home).

I acquired some 401 K benefits from my work after the separation.

Should I fight court Jurisdiction to file in Texas instead of CA?
Does she have legal right in wealth acquired after the separation?

Thanks.
  #2  
Old 07-07-2005, 06:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 41,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by msamson
What is the name of your state? Texas

My wife filed a petition for dissolution of marriage with the Californa Suprior court. We are married since 88 and lived in Texas and other states. Never lived in California as a couple.

We are physically separated for the last 7 years. She moved to California and I was helping her financially all this time.

We don't have childrens or community propert (home).

I acquired some 401 K benefits from my work after the separation.

Should I fight court Jurisdiction to file in Texas instead of CA?
Does she have legal right in wealth acquired after the separation?

Thanks.
If she is a legal resident of CA she had every right to file in CA. You really can't challenge the jurisidiction. If you weren't legally separated then yes, she may have claim against post separation assets. If the amount of money in the 401k is significant...and she is going after a share...then it would probably be in your best interests to get an attorney. However, if it would cost you more to pay an attorney than her possible share of the 401k....then maybe it would be better to represent yourself.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.