 | 
09-03-2007, 11:42 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Southern California
Posts: 6
| | | Annulment question What is the name of your state?
California. This question is to help my eldest daughter. I know that getting a "no-fault" divorce is an option. Still, an annulment may be the best choice to help my daughter preserve her self-esteem. She is a dynamic young woman and doesn't need "baggage" of a failed marriage to encumber her later in life. Annulment grounds would be fraud. She can show that the reason her spouse married her was to obtain a green card. It has been 2-1/2 years since they were wed. If getting an annulment would result in her spouse reverting to illegal alien status (that part is complicated and not entirely his fault--in fact, he may already have a green card), then she would seek another option: either wait until he has his green card in hand or go for a divorce. Question then is "If she proceeds with annulment, will spouse face deportation or could he have the green card revoked?"
-- abinc | 
09-03-2007, 11:45 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 31,823
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by abinc What is the name of your state?
California. This question is to help my eldest daughter. I know that getting a "no-fault" divorce is an option. Still, an annulment may be the best choice to help my daughter preserve her self-esteem. She is a dynamic young woman and doesn't need "baggage" of a failed marriage to encumber her later in life. Annulment grounds would be fraud. She can show that the reason her spouse married her was to obtain a green card. It has been 2-1/2 years since they were wed. If getting an annulment would result in her spouse reverting to illegal alien status (that part is complicated and not entirely his fault--in fact, he may already have a green card), then she would seek another option: either wait until he has his green card in hand or go for a divorce. Question then is "If she proceeds with annulment, will spouse face deportation or could he have the green card revoked?"
-- abinc | How does she prove that the reason her spouse married her was just to obtain a green card and that she knew nothing about his reason? If she knew anything about his reason then she is just as guilty as he in defrauding the federal government. If she didn't know and can't prove it then she cannot prove fraud and hence would not get an annulment. Tell her to get a divorce. She chose to marry him. She chose this situation. now she can live with the idea of having been divorced.
__________________
Parents should remember three things: Love your kids more than you hate your ex (or soon to be ex) & when you have children the relationship with the other parent is until death parts you & how you treat your children determines what type of nursing home you end up in. Nothing stated by me should be taken as giving you legal advice or forming an attorney/client relationship. The devil is in the details after all.
Licensed to practice law in Ohio and a Guardian Ad Litem for children
| 
09-03-2007, 12:05 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: O~HI~O
Posts: 1,986
| | | And did he enter the United States legally?
__________________ Quote: Ecc 7:1 A good name [is] better than precious ointment; and the day of death than the day of one's birth. "There are two letter[s] in the word of [Life] that, in part gives direct meaning to it, "IF."" By /SL/ aka., April 23, 2008
Only by cutting through the darkness of ignorance, and prejudice can we achieve true justice; and
to all those who corrupt the search for truth be warned, the "Sword of Justice" cuts both ways! | | 
09-03-2007, 12:12 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Southern California
Posts: 6
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogal How does she prove that the reason her spouse married her was just to obtain a green card and that she knew nothing about his reason? If she knew anything about his reason then she is just as guilty as he in defrauding the federal government. If she didn't know and can't prove it then she cannot prove fraud and hence would not get an annulment. Tell her to get a divorce. She chose to marry him. She chose this situation. now she can live with the idea of having been divorced. | Good answer. I'll give a couple more details. He was a minor when brought to the US by his parents. They applied for permanent resident status but US law was silent about minors who reached majority while parental applications were pending. Hence his parents had status, but he did not. Immigration officials told him -- and her -- that he needed to marry to remain in this country. Well and good, if it is a business arrangement, but in our society, "love" is supposed to be the main reason for matrimony. My daughter truly loved the guy and she believed that he loved her. That was the basis for the marriage. She understood that she was "doing the right thing" by him and that he valued her. Since then, she has become disillusioned by his actions. They do not live together anymore so it is questionable if his motives were ever anything but getting residency status.
Now, on the basis of the foregoing, is divorce still the only option?
--abinc | 
09-03-2007, 12:22 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: O~HI~O
Posts: 1,986
| | | Curious, how long have they been married? Did your daughter file the form
to adjust his status?
__________________ Quote: Ecc 7:1 A good name [is] better than precious ointment; and the day of death than the day of one's birth. "There are two letter[s] in the word of [Life] that, in part gives direct meaning to it, "IF."" By /SL/ aka., April 23, 2008
Only by cutting through the darkness of ignorance, and prejudice can we achieve true justice; and
to all those who corrupt the search for truth be warned, the "Sword of Justice" cuts both ways! | | 
09-03-2007, 12:22 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 11,783
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by abinc Immigration officials told him -- and her -- that he needed to marry to remain in this country. | Was she aware that he'd been told that? Quote: |
Well and good, if it is a business arrangement, but in our society, "love" is supposed to be the main reason for matrimony.
| Perhaps in our romantic selves, yes. But LEGALLY marriage IS a business contract, and it's best to always remember that. Quote: |
My daughter truly loved the guy and she believed that he loved her. That was the basis for the marriage.
| Perhaps, on her end. Perhaps, even on his at first. But if she knew that he ALSO 'needed' to get married in order to remain in the country than no fraud occurred. Quote: |
She understood that she was "doing the right thing" by him
| By marrying him so he could remain in the country? Just because he doesn't 'value her' NOW doesn't mean he didn't THEN. Quote: |
Since then, she has become disillusioned by his actions.
| That's sort of an occupational hazard of marriage. Quote: |
Now, on the basis of the foregoing, is divorce still the only option?
| Attempting to salvage the relationship is always an option.
__________________ Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending.
~ Carl Bard | 
09-03-2007, 12:24 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Southern California
Posts: 6
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by SHORTY LONG And did he enter the United States legally? | Yes. With father on H-1B visa. Arrived at age 15. He "aged-out" at 18. Was left in a legal limbo because of the US immigration laws. If deported, he would have been subject to arrest in home country on grounds of avoiding military service.
--abinc | 
09-03-2007, 12:26 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Southern California
Posts: 6
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by SHORTY LONG Curious, how long have they been married? Did your daughter file the form
to adjust his status? | Married 2-1/2 years. He applied for permanent residency immediately thereafter. | 
09-03-2007, 12:37 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Southern California
Posts: 6
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CJane Was she aware that he'd been told that?
Perhaps in our romantic selves, yes. But LEGALLY marriage IS a business contract, and it's best to always remember that.
Perhaps, on her end. Perhaps, even on his at first. But if she knew that he ALSO 'needed' to get married in order to remain in the country than no fraud occurred.
By marrying him so he could remain in the country?
Just because he doesn't 'value her' NOW doesn't mean he didn't THEN.
That's sort of an occupational hazard of marriage.
Attempting to salvage the relationship is always an option. | I understand your points. Perhaps I am making a distinction where none exists: I am considering "fraud" as misrepresenting his reason for entering marriage. If he needed her to remain in the US, but loved her and THAT was the basis for marriage, it is one thing. But if his prime motivation for marriage was to remain in the country and love was a secondary issue, then he lied. In the first case, I would say "It's just one of those things." If the second, then his lie was a fraud but even then, not necessarily the "legal kind." In other words, it may be a deception, but does not meet the legal definition of fraud. Is that what you are hinting at?
-- abinc | 
09-03-2007, 12:42 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Kansas City
Posts: 11,783
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by abinc In other words, it may be a deception, but does not meet the legal definition of fraud. Is that what you are hinting at?
-- abinc | Yes.
AND if she had ANY HINT that he needed to get married to avoid deportation, and married him anyway, it's not even deception any more than it's deception for a man to marry a woman primarily because she's pregnant and he thinks he's 'doing the right thing'.
See what I mean?
__________________ Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending.
~ Carl Bard | 
09-03-2007, 12:47 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Southern California
Posts: 6
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CJane Yes.
AND if she had ANY HINT that he needed to get married to avoid deportation, and married him anyway, it's not even deception any more than it's deception for a man to marry a woman primarily because she's pregnant and he thinks he's 'doing the right thing'.
See what I mean? | OK -- I understand what you all have been saying. I know what has to be done (no-fault divorce) and will take appropriate steps. Thanks.
-- abinc | 
09-03-2007, 02:48 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 31,823
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by abinc Good answer. I'll give a couple more details. He was a minor when brought to the US by his parents. They applied for permanent resident status but US law was silent about minors who reached majority while parental applications were pending. Hence his parents had status, but he did not. Immigration officials told him -- and her -- that he needed to marry to remain in this country. Well and good, if it is a business arrangement, but in our society, "love" is supposed to be the main reason for matrimony. My daughter truly loved the guy and she believed that he loved her. That was the basis for the marriage. She understood that she was "doing the right thing" by him and that he valued her. Since then, she has become disillusioned by his actions. They do not live together anymore so it is questionable if his motives were ever anything but getting residency status.
Now, on the basis of the foregoing, is divorce still the only option?
--abinc | That is not fraud. It is a misconception that "love" is the reason for marriage. It is a romantic reason for marriage but not the ONLY reason for marriage in this country. It is a mistake she made because she "has become disillusioned by his actions". That does NOT mean fraud. That means mistake. Two very different things. She cannot prove that he purposely entered this marriage ONLY to secure residency. She cannot prove that he did anything based on your words. Divorce is her option.
__________________
Parents should remember three things: Love your kids more than you hate your ex (or soon to be ex) & when you have children the relationship with the other parent is until death parts you & how you treat your children determines what type of nursing home you end up in. Nothing stated by me should be taken as giving you legal advice or forming an attorney/client relationship. The devil is in the details after all.
Licensed to practice law in Ohio and a Guardian Ad Litem for children
| |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 PM.