Cheater Husband with another cheater husband

[scornedbrat]

What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? MS
I need to know if anyone knows any laws in MS in regards to my husband cheating with another married man for over a 5 month period. I need to know if I have any special rights - that are different from just him cheating with a woman? Can anyone help me, he is wanting to kick me out of our house-with my 2 children, and I can just take what furniture I want because he is confused.
BTW I have tests done to the extreme! and will contiue to have them done every 3 months for the next year!

[TinkerBelleLuvr]

The house is the marital house. You don't have to leave until a judge says you have to.

Might want to check for std's etc due to husband's infidelity.

[Antigone*of*Greece]

Originally Posted by scornedbrat

What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? MS
I need to know if anyone knows any laws in MS in regards to my husband cheating with another married man for over a 5 month period. I need to know if I have any special rights - that are different from just him cheating with a woman? Can anyone help me, he is wanting to kick me out of our house-with my 2 children, and I can take what furniture I want and that be that since he is confused.

You have the same rights if he had cheated on you with a woman.

I agree with Tink, you should really get yourself tested.

[LdiJ]

Originally Posted by scornedbrat

What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? MS
I need to know if anyone knows any laws in MS in regards to my husband cheating with another married man for over a 5 month period. I need to know if I have any special rights - that are different from just him cheating with a woman? Can anyone help me, he is wanting to kick me out of our house-with my 2 children, and I can just take what furniture I want because he is confused.
BTW I have tests done to the extreme! and will contiue to have them done every 3 months for the next year!

Please DO NOT edit your original post to respond to questions from other posters. Please simply post a normal response.

[VeronicaLodge]

i think anal and oral sex is still illegal in MS even between husband and wife, so maybe you can turn him in for that.

[Proserpina]

VeronicaLodge i think anal and oral sex is still illegal in MS even between husband and wife, so maybe you can turn him in forthat

Is OP secretly watching them to gather evidence?! Jeepers I hope I don't have to obsess over what proof she might have ('cos I'm having bizarre "peeping tom" images here!)

[Ohiogal]

Originally Posted by VeronicaLodge

i think anal and oral sex is still illegal in MS even between husband and wife, so maybe you can turn him in for that.

The Supreme Court ruled on such a law(Lawrence v. Texas). The MS law would be unconstitutional even if on the books.

[Ohiogal]

Originally Posted by Dogmatique

Is OP secretly watching them to gather evidence?! Jeepers I hope I don't have to obsess over what proof she might have ('cos I'm having bizarre "peeping tom" images here!)

Such laws are unconstitutional. In Lawrence v. Texas the following was stated:

Bowers’ rationale does not withstand careful analysis. In his dissenting opinion in Bowers Justice Stevens concluded that (1) the fact a State’s governing majority has traditionally viewed a particular practice as immoral is not a sufficient reason for upholding a law prohibiting the practice, and (2) individual decisions concerning the intimacies of physical relationships, even when not intended to produce offspring, are a form of “liberty” protected by due process. That analysis should have controlled Bowers, and it controls here. Bowers was not correct when it was decided, is not correct today, and is hereby overruled. This case does not involve minors, persons who might be injured or coerced, those who might not easily refuse consent, or public conduct or prostitution. It does involve two adults who, with full and mutual consent, engaged in sexual practices common to a homosexual lifestyle. Petitioners’ right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in private conduct without government intervention. Casey, supra, at 847. The Texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the individual’s personal and private life. Pp. 17—18.

By Lawrence v. Texas, adultery laws that make adultery a crime can also be considered unconstitutional. The law being overturned:

The complaints described their crime as “deviate sexual intercourse, namely anal sex, with a member of the same sex (man).” App. to Pet. for Cert. 127a, 139a. The applicable state law is Tex. Penal Code Ann. §21.06(a) (2003). It provides: “A person commits an offense if he engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex.” The statute defines “[d]eviate sexual intercourse” as follows:

“(A) any contact between any part of the genitals of one person and the mouth or anus of another person; or

“(B) the penetration of the genitals or the anus of another person with an object.” §21.01(1).

[Proserpina]

Thanks, OG - I think I was just a little disturbed pondering how exactly OP would obtain proof re Veronica's post!

[VeronicaLodge]

Originally Posted by Ohiogal

The Supreme Court ruled on such a law(Lawrence v. Texas). The MS law would be unconstitutional even if on the books.

hhahahaha good to know OG! i was worried about it when i lived in MS.

they also have a law about not keeping your stud horse within so many feet of the road, the funny thing is it is in the statutes about sex!