FUN ONE! Strictly for the loophole finders!

[king sol]

What is the name of your state? CA

What do you think??????

Divorce filed by husband 3/94, handled through his ($200) paralegal. Married 8+ years.

Parties agree to all terms, paralegal calls at end of 10/94, divorce final as of 10/20. Papers are in the mail.

Wife remarries mid 11/94 (Vegas!)

Final dissolution arrives at some point after vows to new love. OH OH!
Final dissolution signed by judge, document indicates husband/petitioner correctly. Wife/respondent refered to as "First name, North, Street address"

Simply a typo, right?!!

But...............................

Wife/Respondent never metions the error.

Is there any legal loopholes or "Frankie Lyman" case laws that could benefit wife/respondent?

Admittedly, a little bitter. And...regretful! Did not seek alimony, child support, house or retirement...............Opted for the "nice and easy" "see ya' later aligator" divorce.

Could she recoop in anyway, by any legal manuveour.....to cash in on retirement benefit, SSI, or the house when the Ex "bites the dust?"

Not concerned about marriage to new love being invalid or a bigamist......

Just interested in WHAT MIGHT BE!

 

[nextwife]

Maybe I'm missing something. Wife and husband divorced. Final decree exists, never challenged. She IS named in divorce decree.

So what is the "legal loophole" that exists? Is she now wishing to challenge the terms of the divorce? She OBVIOUSLY recognizes that she IS divorced, and recognizes that she has a final decree BECAUSE she has since remarried. If she now challenges the validity of this divorce, than she is challenging the validity of her second marriage. And, on what basis would she do so?

 

[seniorjudge]

Courts make typos all the time.

No big deal.

It's a valid judgment in that lawsuit.