Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Divorce, Separation & Annulment

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2003, 09:49 AM
impalass
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Is it her house too ????


What is the name of your state? TEXAS
Please please help !!!! My question seems fairly simple .. if more details are needed do not hesitate. My husband purchased a mobile home while married to his ex wife .. she had no job and extremely bad credit therefore the loan was in his name only.They were married 7 years living together 2, in the divorce decree she was ordered to transfer into her name after showing interest in doing so... it never was done and she soon became 9 months late paying and finally it will be repossessed. Because they were married when it was purchased is she responsable for half the debt ??? or will my husband be solely responsable ?

Also because of this situation when it is time for me to purchase a home next year will I be penalized because of my husbands credit or if I apply for a loan will it solely be based on my credit history which is perfect ? We have only been married a year.

Thankyou for all advice offered
  #2  
Old 02-20-2003, 10:05 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,317
If the loan was in his name only he is solely responsible for the debt. A court order cannot override a signed contract between lender and borrower.

You can use your credit only to apply for a mortgage or other credit.
__________________
__________
"I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask none to live for me, nor do I live for any others. I am not the means to any end others may wish to accomplish. I am not a tool for their use. I am not a sacrifice on their altars." Ayn Rand
  #3  
Old 02-21-2003, 02:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,088
If the divorce decree stated she had to pay it, this does not mean the original lender has to go by that. What it does is give him the option of taking her back to court for not following the court order. He will still have to pay it but he might be able to get something back from her, not likely but if she has a job its worth a shot.
__________________
Disclaimer: I am not a gypsy fortune teller
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.