What is the name of your state?MA
Hi,
my husband went through a hearig for malicious destruction of property. He has a lawyer, and I can not afford one. I was told by police prosecutor that there is more than enough evidence so I don't have to go to the hearing.
The judge found there is not enough evidence.
I still have as evidece these things: my husbands e-mails saying he destroyed my clothes; my destroyed clothes and some belongings; police report which is a bit vague but mentions destroyed property; two policemen who saw the desctruction in our home; two people who saw the destructon after it happened, one of whom is my brother; the neighbourhs who saw the thrown out torn stuff.
Provided that I have this evidence, but it was never presented,
do you think I should file criminal charges on my own now, so that I am paid for what I lost?
Are they going to be criminal, or civil charges?
Thank you.
Hi,
my husband went through a hearig for malicious destruction of property. He has a lawyer, and I can not afford one. I was told by police prosecutor that there is more than enough evidence so I don't have to go to the hearing.
The judge found there is not enough evidence.
I still have as evidece these things: my husbands e-mails saying he destroyed my clothes; my destroyed clothes and some belongings; police report which is a bit vague but mentions destroyed property; two policemen who saw the desctruction in our home; two people who saw the destructon after it happened, one of whom is my brother; the neighbourhs who saw the thrown out torn stuff.
Provided that I have this evidence, but it was never presented,
do you think I should file criminal charges on my own now, so that I am paid for what I lost?
Are they going to be criminal, or civil charges?
Thank you.