![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Previous marriages... or is my wife a bigamist?What is the name of your state? My state is California & Washington state. I am planning to move to Washington from California. (which one is best for the legal proceedings?) My main question: I believe my (soon to be) ex-wife has been married before and just "left" the guy without a divorce. I believe one marriage took place in Northern California, and the other marriage in Nevada. (yeap, married twice) I need to know how to track the marriages/divorces down. I do not have the "married" names (I heard them once or twice but never recorded the fact). I do have the birth name and after each of the marriages ended she reverted to using the birth name. How do I check this out? I would *LOVE* to avoid a divorce hassle, and if my theory checks out (90% says 'yes') then I can just annul or just throw up my hands and say "**** it" and leave. We own no community property together whatsoever and no children (the marriage lasted - on paper - six months although physically we never really lived together as man and wife for any period beyond a couple of weeks at a time, total time served about 2 months - I qualify for EARLY PAROLE from this marriage (yeap, its a sentence - my offense - capital stupidity in the first degree). Please help! Last edited by happy divorce; 04-05-2003 at 06:34 AM. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Getting an annulment can be harder/longer than getting a divorce. Also the time/money you spend tracking the "proof" down will add up. CA's a no fault state - just file for divorce and be done with it. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| My rational for wanting annulment instead of divorce is that she will -never- have any recourse or redress with me... forever. But in divorce the **** can always hit the fan months or years ahead. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| If you don't have kids, it's really pretty straightforward and there shouldn't be any hassles from her in the future. But suit yourself. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| I just don't want to be stuck with any virginamony (alimony). She is nuts enough to try to figure something out inspite of being married for only a few months. I am thinking that she might try to get a lawyer to chase that. (is it possible?). I am in the entertainment industry so they may try to see me as 'deep pockets'. (nope, the story hasn't hit the National Enquirer) |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| The chances of her getting alimony are so close to nil I wouldn't even worry about it. It's no longer that easy to get, and a marriage of a few months - fuggedaboutit. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| California has a nightmare document/remedy called: Temporary Order for Support Such order is granted on an ex-parte basis and is activated instantly even before the first hearing of anything. Yeap. Gotta love California. ![]() I found a handwritten note from her saying about this type of order. This is the major major reason I want the annulment if available. Last edited by happy divorce; 04-07-2003 at 06:10 AM. |
![]() |