the court order has two parts. The required conveyance of title (not even sure that is the case here. it might simply have been an improperly acted upon order to allow the sale of the property) and the separate action of the the other party owing our OP part of the proceeds of the sale of the property.
They are separate isssues and the money has nothing to do with the interest in the property. The money is a court ordered division of the proceeds of the sale irrespective of the title interest. As an example; man and wife divorce. wife had title in her name only the entire time of the marriage. Judge orders wife to pay husband 50% of the appreciation of value realized during time of marriage and requires house to be sold if wife cannot acquire funds in any other manner.
Husband has a justifiable lien on the property simply due to the fact he is due proceeds from the sale of the property not because he ever had any title interest in the property but that the court has required he be paid part of the proceeds of the sale of the property. This simply requires the closing agent to pay off the lien to allow a clear title to be passed to buyer. It is not a matter of interest in the house but simply a matter of the wife owing the husband and since the proceeds are due specifically from the house moneys, that allows the lien to be placed on the house so the house cannot be sold without husband receiving his due.
here is an example of how it can work:
Divorce Liens