Sharmoota0909...

[stealth2]

I'm sorry you closed your thread before I had a chance to reply, as I asked the questions I did for a reason.

Your resigning your job will be considered voluntary un/der-employment when it comes to calculating child support. So yes, you will be assessed based on your income in that job. "Assuming" that you did not adopt the children that are hers, you will only be responsible for supporting the child you share.

I hope you give serious thought to your plan to walk away without even minimum visitation with your child. For several reasons. Your child will then be raised the same way as your step-kids, and the only one you will realistically be able to blame for how s/he turns out will be yourself - because that will have been the fate you have chosen for your child. You will regret having a child you don't know - and will never escape the knowledge that you abandoned him/her. If/when you choose to try and get back into his/her life? You can expect to be met with hostility. And rightfully so, if I am honest. PLEASE reconsider this and opt to fight for your child.

 

[Zigner]

I'm sorry you closed your thread before I had a chance to reply, as I asked the questions I did for a reason.

Your resigning your job will be considered voluntary un/der-employment when it comes to calculating child support. So yes, you will be assessed based on your income in that job. "Assuming" that you did not adopt the children that are hers, you will only be responsible for supporting the child you share.

I hope you give serious thought to your plan to walk away without even minimum visitation with your child. For several reasons. Your child will then be raised the same way as your step-kids, and the only one you will realistically be able to blame for how s/he turns out will be yourself - because that will have been the fate you have chosen for your child. You will regret having a child you don't know - and will never escape the knowledge that you abandoned him/her. If/when you choose to try and get back into his/her life? You can expect to be met with hostility. And rightfully so, if I am honest. PLEASE reconsider this and opt to fight for your child. The guys at the mensdivorce forums can help you with strategy, while we can help with the law.

Just to give you an idea of this poster's frame of mind - I reported the post where he told OG to get back in the (bleep) kitchen. That's what caused the thread to be locked and the poster to be banned.

 

[stealth2]

Just to give you an idea of this poster's frame of mind - I reported the post where he told OG to get back in the (bleep) kitchen. That's what caused the thread to be locked and the poster to be banned.

Aaaah, I see.

 

[quincy]

I'm sorry you closed your thread before I had a chance to reply, as I asked the questions I did for a reason ...

When you see that a thread has been locked, it will be the rare thread that has been locked by choice of the original poster. The moderator generally will have reviewed the thread and locked it for good reason.

There were several threads created last night that required editing and locking due to vulgar language and other clear violations of the terms of service of this site. One original poster named GD1986 (I assume he is now a banned member) actually leveled death threats against a forum member.

 

[eerelations]

There were several threads created last night that required locking due to vulgar language and other clear violations of the terms of service of this site. One original poster (I assume now a banned member) actually leveled death threats against a forum member.

Whew! Was it a full moon last night?

 

[stealth2]

When you see that a thread has been locked, it will be the rare thread that has been locked by choice of the original poster. The moderator generally will have reviewed the thread and locked it for good reason.

There were several threads created last night that required editing and locking due to vulgar language and other clear violations of the terms of service of this site. One original poster named GD1986 (I assume he is now a banned member) actually leveled death threats against a forum member.

I miss all the fun.

 

[Silverplum]

I miss all the fun.

So do I!

I admire your reason/s for trying to make some new kind of sense to Sharpoopy, because I know you care about the ramifications for his child. *hugs stealth*

 

[quincy]

It was an interesting night, providing as it did a bit of an insight into the minds of the intellectually impaired.

 

[Proserpina]

When you see that a thread has been locked, it will be the rare thread that has been locked by choice of the original poster. The moderator generally will have reviewed the thread and locked it for good reason.

There were several threads created last night that required editing and locking due to vulgar language and other clear violations of the terms of service of this site. One original poster named GD1986 (I assume he is now a banned member) actually leveled death threats against a forum member.

How ... lovely!

 

[Ohiogal]

Just to give you an idea of this poster's frame of mind - I reported the post where he told OG to get back in the (bleep) kitchen. That's what caused the thread to be locked and the poster to be banned.

I was told to get back in the kitchen? I missed that being at court and all. Good grief.

 

[Zigner]

I was told to get back in the kitchen? I missed that being at court and all. Good grief.

I caught it early, so I was able protect your delicate feminine eyes and sensibilities.

 

[quincy]

I caught it early, so I was able protect your delicate feminine eyes and sensibilities.

Your goal was far more noble than mine. I was trying to protect the delicate eyes and sensibilities of latigo.

 

[Eekamouse]

I caught it early, so I was able protect your delicate feminine eyes and sensibilities.

But seriously, OG, get back in that kitchen and rattle them pots and pans.