 | 
07-22-2004, 01:45 PM
| | | | Is this still a default divorce?
What is the name of your state? Idaho
I filed for divorce on June 9th of this year, and fully expected my husband to contest the divorce. He never filed an answer to the divorce within the 20 day limit, but he did file, through his attorney, the following: Notice of Appearance (on the 18th of June), Motion for Temporary Custody, Affidavit, and Notice of Hearing Re: Motion for Temporary Custody (all on the 23rd of June). The Temporary Custody motion was never heard because he had not taken the required Divorce Orientation course.
Nothing else has been file by either of us, so I am wondering if I can proceed with the divorce as a default divorce or if it is now considered a contested divorce. |
07-22-2004, 01:54 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,543
| | | Sounds to me like it is 'contested'. What does YOUR attorney say??
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).
Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
|
07-25-2004, 12:04 PM
| | | | Sorry
Didn't mean to be rude. You shouldn't be either. |
08-10-2004, 09:09 PM
| | | | when an attorney files a entry of appearence for his client, that is considered an answer to the summons. it is contested. |
08-10-2004, 10:37 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,543
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by truedjrfan when an attorney files a entry of appearence for his client, that is considered an answer to the summons. it is contested. | And of course, that is not true.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).
Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
| |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread |  Linear Mode | | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM.
