If your name is not on the account... Yes.
Its morally wrong on many levels, but its not necessarily illegal even if her name is not on the account. They are married and not legally separated, and he obviously gave her access to the account, and has not rescinded that access. (which he could easily do)
You don't know if he gave her access. She may have stolen the checks or taken the ATM card.
We don't know that he gave her access. If she is questioning it now, he probably didn't.
Yes both are not moral...
Use that argument when he has you prosecuted. See if it sticks. In case you need to know, it won't.
Background check on the "whore", perhaps?
Ahhhh.... there's a thought. Although "whore" wouldn't come up unless she's been convicted and chances are if she's just sleeping with THIS married man, she'll get off (wait, they're both already getting off). Nevermind.
Yes, it was morally wrong for him to get a girlfriend, while you were still in the house and to leave his daughter. Some men should be strung up, IMO.
Which is why I said "not necessarily illegal".
You stated that as a fact. Obviously? BASED ON WHAT? The fact that they were married? Sorry but I know many married couples that keep their finances completely separate.
Ok...valid point. I should not have said "obviously." I should have said that he "may have given her access".
And that I would have agreed with. IF he gave her access and permission to access the accounts and did not rescind that permission then there is a problem. Just the fact of being married does NOT give her the right to access his accounts however.