![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
However there are several people on these forums who feel very passionately that college expenses should never be included in a court order, even if its an agreed order.
__________________ in vino veritas |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
However, I agree that with only a 10k difference, alimony is highly unlikely.
__________________ in vino veritas |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| I'm one of those, and I feel passionately because I experienced how things can change. My dad was well and earning a decent living one day- and disabled and suffering a brain tumor the next. He therefore, thankfully because he was married and NOT under any court order, had the option and flexibility of choosing to do what he could BASED ON HIS CIRCUMSTANCES AT THE TIME. One cannot know what the future holds, therefore one should not be locked into something that may no longer be as "do-able" when the time comes. Additionally, had I been treating my dad with disrespect and disdain, and been unwilling to spend time with him, He should not have then been OBLIGATED to pay squat to help me further once I achieved adulthood. Which is also why I do not believe that there should be unmodifiable spousal support. Our employment, health and career fields are NOT unmodifiable! And, If it's a property settlement CALL it a property settlement.
__________________ Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"! Last edited by nextwife; 06-23-2008 at 01:10 PM. |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
For example, if it were me in his situation, I'd happily agree to pay some amount of the college expenses in exchange for a reduced property settlement or reduced alimony. That way, I know that the money would be going somewhere I want it to go. My ex-wife, OTOH, might be happy to give up a little present money to ensure that my daughter has money to go to college. I'm not saying that's right for every one (or even very many people). But it's something that could easily be put on the table as a negotiated issue. Basically, IMHO, the more things on the table, the easier it is for people to give up things they don't care about and get things that are important. The more you take off the table, the more likely people are to end up fighting. But if they can't agree on a win-win, it goes to court and the judge would not order child support after age 18. No one suggested that anyone would be forced to agree to child support past age 18 in FL. |
![]() |