![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Will Legal Seperation protect me from lawsuitCalifornia. If I legally seperate from my husband, and he hurts someone or does damage to anyones property while drunk and driving, Can I still be held liable. I have property in my name only that I owned solely before marriage and he has signed a quit claim. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "If I legally seperate from my husband, and he hurts someone or does damage to anyones property while drunk and driving, Can I still be held liable." *** As you asked it, no. You would not be LIABLE for his conduct. However, I think your real question was can your assets be claimed to pay damages?? And the question to that is...... probably. Any communal assets could be seized or levied by a judgment. "I have property in my name only that I owned solely before marriage and he has signed a quit claim." *** Any property that is NOT communal would be exempt from claims against him. Curious though... if the property was in pre-marriage and in your name only, why the 'quit claim'??
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution). Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Because I refinanced and the lender required the quit claim. So my property is protected even without a seperation or divorce? |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "So my property is protected even without a seperation or divorce?" *** That is NOT what I said. Any communal property (even quit claimed) COULD be subject to a claim. And the reason is that even a quit claim could be challenged as to its validity by a creditor.
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution). Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! |
![]() |