After the last few posts I've come to the conclusion that the differences I have with this GAL is what we perceive to be in the best interest of GS.
I think it is in the best interest of GS to be back home and going to family counseling with us. I see his current failing grades, school abscenses, lack of involvement in any extra-curricular activity, and non-compliance in therapy as signs he has deteriorated in the almost 7 months in foster care away from us.
I think the GAL sees his current failing grades, school abscenses, lack of involvement in any extra-curricular activity, and non-compliance in therapy as signs that I messed him up.
When it comes down to it, GAL is the one who has prevented me from speaking to GS's counselors, the caseworkers all deferred to him to give me that information & authority. GAL has seen GS get mad at me, and the results were GAL got a 'no visitation' order on me until the counselor said it was OK. The problem is, multiple changes in counselors, none of whom I've been able to speak with, and now non-compliance by GS has allowed GS to throw a teen-age tantrum and get what he wanted--stopping him from seeing me. Both times the GAL did this, GS had ulterior motives to get mad at me. The first time was so he'd get sent to the hospital where his girlfriend was. Caseworker was told by the doctor at that time so 11 days after that hospitalization he OD'd but caseworker had him sent to a different hospital. Caseworker never told the GAL that GS apparently staged the tantrum to go to the hospital to see his girl. The second time the GAL got a 'no visitation' order, GS was mad because I wouldn't give him money. I gave him the things he said he needed to buy. GS said if I didn't give him money, he'd get the GAL to stop visitation. Again, the GAL was not aware that GS was attempting to get money from me and said he'd get the GAL to stop visitation if I didn't give it to him.
Apparently, the GAL thinks he was acting in the best interest of GS, but I think the best interest would have been served by addressing his tantrum and extortion attempts directly with us. Despite GAL's assertions that he "thinks GS's claims of attempted suicide in foster care are false", he's "afraid to upset GS for fear he will attempt suicide".
I keep comparing GS with "Rachel Canning", the high school senior who left home at 18 then sued her parents for support and her college fund. She was mad because her parents had rules about who she saw & curfew. She wanted her independance, but she wanted it paid for by her parents. GS wanted his independance, and he used CPS to try to get it. Unfortunately, it seems that he's been blaming me that it didn't work out the way he wanted.