I believe this has happened to me more than once, too. I seem to remember Oklahoma (which uses/used a convoluted system of PDF files you can't copy and paste from rather than plain text on the web) changing a document entirely in the time it took me to post a reply, which reply of course was hand-typed.
There's also the distinct possibility that I made a wrong turn at Albuquerque.
For the OP's benefit, here's attempt #2 at the pertinent information:
http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/813/12
(c) The temporary restraining order is in effect until a hearing is held on issuance of an injunction under sub. (4), except that the court may extend the temporary restraining order under s. 813.1285. The temporary restraining order is not voided if the respondent is admitted into a dwelling that the order directs him or her to avoid. A judge or circuit court commissioner shall hold a hearing on issuance of an injunction within 14 days after the temporary restraining order is issued, unless the time is extended upon the written consent of the parties, extended under s. 801.58 (2m), or extended once for 14 days upon a finding that the respondent has not been served with a copy of the temporary restraining order although the petitioner has exercised due diligence. A judge or court commissioner may not extend the temporary restraining order in lieu of ruling on the issuance of an injunction.
As well as the intended information on terminating tenancy with an injunction:
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2007/related/acts/184.pdf
http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/704/16
(1)  Terminating tenancy by tenant. A residential tenant may terminate his or her tenancy and remove from the premises if both of the following apply:
(a) The tenant or a child of the tenant faces an imminent threat of serious physical harm from another person if the tenant remains on the premises.
(b) The tenant provides the landlord with notice in the manner provided under s. 704.21 and with a certified copy of any of the following:
1. An injunction order under s. 813.12 (4) protecting the tenant from the person.
2. An injunction order under s. 813.122 protecting a child of the tenant from the person.
3. An injunction order under s. 813.125 (4) protecting the tenant or a child of the tenant from the person, based on the person's engaging in an act that would constitute sexual assault under s. 940.225, 948.02, or 948.025, or stalking under s. 940.32, or attempting or threatening to do the same.
4. A condition of release under ch. 969 ordering the person not to contact the tenant.
5. A criminal complaint alleging that the person sexually assaulted the tenant or a child of the tenant under s. 940.225, 948.02, or 948.025.
6. A criminal complaint alleging that the person stalked the tenant or a child of the tenant under s. 940.32.
7. A criminal complaint that was filed against the person as a result of the person being arrested for committing a domestic abuse offense against the tenant under s. 968.075.
And in correcting myself I realized what happened: the Great State of Wisconsin recycles their Act numbers as they pass through the legislature each year. I followed a link to "Act 184" from 2008 (for the 2007 version), but the number was recycled in 2011 and 2013 at a minimum. Rather than give each page a globally unique name, the pages just forward to the most recent act with the relevant number.