curiousminds
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? North Dakota
the defendant is arrested details are in news papers and on the news.
Exact dates, times, location and weights.
Then in court the defendant hears audio evidence collected during "controlled buys"
Bam! Confirmation on idenity!
Defendant has contacted informant and states cops never hid idenity, they were very open during questioning. Protecting informants idenity was something they cared less about.
Shouldn't the informant have at the very least been informed they were no longer confidential?
are the police, courts, whomever responsible to protect the idenity per the agreement?
If the audio evidence collected was used in court shouldn't there have been some contact with a judge attorneys or anyone?
Any help is appreciated,
the defendant is arrested details are in news papers and on the news.
Exact dates, times, location and weights.
Then in court the defendant hears audio evidence collected during "controlled buys"
Bam! Confirmation on idenity!
Defendant has contacted informant and states cops never hid idenity, they were very open during questioning. Protecting informants idenity was something they cared less about.
Shouldn't the informant have at the very least been informed they were no longer confidential?
are the police, courts, whomever responsible to protect the idenity per the agreement?
If the audio evidence collected was used in court shouldn't there have been some contact with a judge attorneys or anyone?
Any help is appreciated,
Last edited: